• WatDabney@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    And in turn, I don’t understand this comment. You seem to be saying that young people should just figure things out for themselves, and asking why it should be someone else’s responsibility to provide them with guidance.

    Is that what you actually believe?

    • Revonult@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      The act of people calling out toxicity is the guidance. It is corrective action. It’s disciplining a child.

      Your orgional comment reads

      Toxic man: doing something toxic

      The left: Don’t do that is toxic.

      Toxic man: what should I do instead?

      The left: ??? WTF ???

      Toxic man: oh guess I am just gunna keep doing what I am doing if you aren’t going to tell me what to do.

      The answer is literally stop doing that thing. Obviously people need role models, young people are going to make mistakes, and when they make mistakes they need to be corrected. It is on the person to change their behavior. It isn’t a failure of “the left” from preventing this behavior, it’s a failure of those acting poorly to correct their behavior after being called out for it.

      I just don’t understand how someone can write a comment implying it’s “the lefts” fault for not elevating people out of the absolute shit hole wasteland of ethics and behavior the GOP and right wing personalities have created. Like damn maybe you right, people like Andrew Tate are really a failing by left wing ideology to prevent them from spouting toxic nonsense.

      Edit: Changed him back to them in last paragraph

      • WatDabney@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Your orgional comment reads

        Toxic man: doing something toxic

        No it doesn’t.

        It’s literally right there, just a couple of posts up from this one. There’s no excuse for misrepresenting it.

        Here’s what I actually said:

        The left: “The patriarchy and toxic masculinity are evil and destructive!”

        Young men: “Okay. What should I do instead then?”

        l>The left: “Fuck off!”

        I didn’t stipulate “young” men by accident - that’s the central point. I’m not talking about adults who have already developed a set of behaviors (which makes your first sentence entirely and completely wrong). I’m talking about young people - people who are lost and confused and casting about for guidance, as virtually all young people are (and not coincidentally, that’s also what the linked article is talking about).

        And ironically enough, you actually provide an example of the problem insofar as you don’t even acknowledge the distinction - you just lump them in with overtly misogynistic and toxic adults and condemn them each and all. You not only refuse to provide them with the guidance they want and need, but bristle self-righteously at the very thought that there might be any expectation that you should.

        And meanwhile, people like Jordan Peterson and Andrew Tate go out of their way to recognize them and cultivate them. And it works not least because you’ve already written them off.

        Which is pretty much exactly my point, and the point of the linked article. We need to do more than simply assume that young men are automatically misogynists and therefore condemn them. We need to provide them with something positive - an actual path that they can follow that leads to a better way of living. They’re right there, right now - at the crossroads in their lives, wondering how they should go about growing into adults, and Jordan Peterson and Andrew Tate and their ilk are right there, right now, telling them a bunch of toxic bullshit.

        And meanwhile, what are we offering them? Just what you said here - the presumption that they’re already toxic, and a bland command to knock it the fuck off.

        Self-evidently, that’s not enough.