This is opinion. So read it as such. But consider it please.

Obviously if you read this based on the title. I assume you oppose the Tories.

But if you are wondering why labour are so keen to manage expectations. There is a reason.

Campaign funding wise the Tories are estimated to be 19m ahead of labour. But honestly at the moment they are not spending a huge amount more.

We know the Tories are skilled at election manipulation. So there is genuine fear that the Tories plan to launch a campaign within the last few days.

I.E. when there is less time and funding to ensure fact checking is effective.

They know Starmer is more publicity aware then Corbyn was. He is able to play it in a way that dose not scare traditional Conservative voters.

They also know thanks to Boris, that the courts are unable to punish them for outright lies during any political campaign. And that Rishi is prepared to lie about and accuse civil servants of lying when challenged.

As huge as polling is against the Tories. All it would take is some dramatic claim against the party or Starmer. To convince Tory traditional voters to bite their tongue and vote Tory. While convincing left wing voters not to vote or to switch to 3rd party in seats where labour are the 1st or 2nd party.

The fact we know they have a huge amount of money unspent. Makes it clear they plan to launch something nearer the end of the election. And the only advantage of leaving it so late. Is it will limit the ability of the party to effectively react. Or fact checkers to be able to prove and distribute evidence of lies.

Please be prepared for this.

  • ProfessorOwl_PhD [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Are you saying you think FPTP has delivered representative Parliament?

    What? Are you actually reading what I’m writing? How did you get this idea from what I said?

    As for action, I bash FPTP every chance I get, including here on Lemmy. But also Reddit (less now), Mastadon and Twitter. I do write into some of the main stream political podcasts I listen to.

    So you say that you don’t like FPTP, especially on niche internet communities, and write in to podcasts. Could you explain to me how these influence the actual Labour Party? Like I used the example of an angry letter as a joke about completely ineffectual action, but you’re genuinely suggesting that writing an angry letter to someone with no connection to the Labour Party is action.

    I voted for AV.

    oh god i’m gonna vote
    You really are a parody of liberal activism.

    • jabjoe@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Voting is how you change things in a democracy and that is the only systems worth having. Even FTPT is still going to give the Tories a massive kicking for their unkind racist crapness. Parties change with the environment their are in or they lose support. So shaping the environment is important. That why you get advocate groups.

      Anyway, I’ve noticed your a hexbear so …

      • ProfessorOwl_PhD [any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Parties change with the environment their are in or they lose support.

        So why aren’t you pressuring the Tories to support PR? Surely if the parties change according to the will of the voters you can just influence any of the parties in the same way, by just voting for them.
        Besides, your original claim was that you could vote labour in, then pressure them to adopt PR - why is it now the voting itself that’s going to pressure them? I’ll admit it at least has some link to the labour party, unlike writing letters to podcasts, but you were saying there was going to be a vague something after the voting that changed their minds.

        Anyway, I’ve noticed your a hexbear so …

        So what? I’ve noticed you’re a fedd, but you don’t hear me harping on about it.