Published: October 31, 2024

  • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    7 days ago

    What does a datacenter need a huge glass front for? Slashing carbon emissions? Yeah right.

  • Cryan24@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    So lots of heat plus combustible material… That sounds like a winning idea to me.

    • Blemgo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      If memory serves right, one of Germany’s datacenters went up in flames a few years ago because they had wooden flooring and no adequate fire suppression systems.

      EDIT: it was in France, and Europe’s biggest datacenter.

  • WraithGear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    This is a puff peice to distract. Microsoft has made no effort to lessen their carbon footprint.

    • SilverFlame@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      I recently had a tour of the Redmond campus. They have multiple geothermal wells for power as well as an air conditioning system that uses almost no energy, it was pretty neat.

    • gsfraley@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      I mean, that’s the mechanism by which carbon is removed. It goes into tree, tree dies or gets cut down taking all the solidified carbon with it, new tree gets planted in its place to repeat the cycle. In fact, the fastest way to scrub carbon with the practice is to farm trees, assuming you do it sustainably.

      • themurphy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        So the best thing you can do with a tree, is to cut it down and use it as materials, if we want to release as little CO2 as possible?

        And ofc this depends on new trees being planted in its stead.

        • gsfraley@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          Yes. Growing a tree from sapling to a giant trunk removes significantly more carbon from the atmosphere than an existing trunk sitting there at mass, unable to store much more carbon.

          And yes, that’s why I clarified that new trees would need to be planted, right on the money.

      • db2@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        You mean sequestered, not removed. It’s one fire away from being back in circulation.

    • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 days ago

      Trees are carbon neutral. They pull the carbon out and sequester it in themselves. When they rot or burn, the carbon is returned.