• IndiBrony@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    But it is about choice: your choice of which version of Linux and which variation of Firefox you’re going to use.

    Silly OP.

    • neidu3@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      Systemd is on my list of “meh, who cares, it works”. Plus, it’s been so long since I messed around with initd that I don’t think I’m able to do it without relearning stuff.

      I’m not a big fan of systemd messing with dns, but I’ll survive. I’m sure I can do some fidgeting and disable it, relying on editing /etc/resol.conf like I used to, but it works well enough now that I can’t be arsed.

    • JoYo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      what’s not to like? seriously, what’s not systemd these days? it just absorbs coreutils like a cancer.

    • Limonene@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      Yes, most of them do, and that is why I complain about it. I want to have the choice. I don’t mind if other people use systemd; I just don’t want it forced one me.

      • freewheel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        Gentoo, Arch, and their derivatives still exist. How important is a legacy init system to you?

        • pivot_root@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          9 days ago

          FYI: Arch uses systemd.

          I don’t mind systemd so I haven’t tried to rip it out, but I can’t imagine trying to replace it with a legacy init system is going to be smooth sailing.

          • freewheel@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 days ago

            Probably true, but Arch being what it is, there’s still the option to install sysvinit or whatever. The question remains - how important is NOT using systemd to the admin in question?

    • madthumbs@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      Yes, and that’s the FUNNY part about it! Lennart went against the UNIX philosophy and is hated for it, but so did Linus Torvalds with the monolithic kernel, and Richard Stallman with Emacs.

    • pivot_root@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 days ago

      Go fuck yourself, Canonical. When I install a package through a package manager, I want the package I requested—not the bullshit you tried to force down my throat.

      • udon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        the other difference between snap and systemd is that there are clearly better alternatives to snap that are technologically superior in practically every sense and not tied to some company that tries to sell out.