• Dr_Box@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    26 days ago

    Brought this up to a friend who is very pro Trump and he said

    “Part of trying to get industry back in the country (which we would be better off with) involves making imports less appealing.”

    • Yokozuna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      26 days ago

      These people have no concept of geo politics and global trade. For example, we produce a lot of the world’s soy, that’s a major export, not many other countries do it on a large scale like that - so we cut the other countries some slack and tell them we won’t produce this particular good so you can have a hand in the global economy. Yes having the production here would be ideal as I’m all for it, but the world is so much more than Murica and they can’t see past their fucking noses.

        • bitchkat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          25 days ago

          Three different ways trump has promised to his effective income

          1. Tariffs - prices directly go up
          2. Income taxes will be raised unless he’s in the 1%
          3. Mass Deportation will make food more expensive because there won’t be any Latinos to pick crops.
    • HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      26 days ago

      Yes it does.

      Do you know why we outsourced everything to China? Because they can do it cheaper.

      You can get it back, have it higher quality, more jobs, better control over it, all that good stuff. But it won’t be cheaper.

      The US sells things they can make comparatively cheaper (not just price, its an opportunity cost) - better educated population, logistic, access to raw material, infrastructure investments. China sells things they can do cheaper - usually the fact that life is cheap in China.