If Dems want any chance of winning in 2026 (midterms), assuming we still have an election, there is only one path forward, and that is things that matter to Americans.
Economic issues that Sanders was successfully campaigning on in 2016 when he was thwarted in the primary. It’s not important to fight over what happened that year, but his platform is 100% the way forward to progress.
You must log in or register to comment.
I believe we need more of a return to Marxism, personally, as his predictions and analysis are only proven more correct with the passage of time and the addition of new data points. That’s why I made an Introduction to Marxism reading list, if anyone wants to take a look.
I agree that Sanders would have won 2016, 2020, and 2024 if he could only run in 2020. However, he hasn’t been allowed to run, rather, the DNC ran rightward despite polling showing this to be a mistake. This is because the DNC is a business that sells policy to Capitalists, not a party run for the working class. Any third party created by Sanders would face the same opposition the Greens and PSL do by liberals, which is why it’s high-time people look towards Marxism.
Good news. Sandernomics includes tariffs on China, and it looks like we’re getting them.
Yes, but it doesn’t include tariffs on every other country in the world who may have made trump feel like a poopy face one day 37 years ago.
This is basically what Republicans did. McCain in 08, Romney in 12. The whole time conservative activists complained bitterly that they were losing elections because they were not nominating “true conservatives”. The RNC was putting their thumb on the scale to nominate squishy moderates believed to be more acceptable to the general electorate. The conservative activists, meanwhile, yelled and screamed that these squishes didn’t represent a clear vision of conservativism, they were just focused group tested sound bites in suits, trying to appeal to everyone and actually appealing to no one. Voters didn’t have a real choice, it was the uniparty kind of thing.
Then came Trump, bold no compromise vision for what his party and the country could be. Voters were willing to give something new a try. It largely sucked, so Biden a centrist squish was elected by a close margin just to restore sanity to government. Biden did do some big things, but he didn’t communicate them well over his term, voters didn’t see benefit, just more centrist squish politician talk stuff. So here comes Trump again, with a bold vision and a promise to shale things up. Voters were willing to put up with all the shit again just to have a politician willing to do something to visibly change their lives. Harris meanwhile ran safely to the centered, studiously avoided differentiating herself from Biden or staking out anything resembling a bold vision. Squish. No change, more of the same.
Dems need to stand for something, we need a vision we can offer to voters.
Probably more than that, Dems need a backbone to actually fight, and fight hard and dirty when needed. Voters are tired of gridlock and nothing changing. They elected the strongman because they figure he won’t get bogged down in political bullshit, he’ll just get shit done, even if it means breaking rules. It’s ok to break some rules if your doing it to help me, say the voters. Not to say that Dems should go all authoritarian, but they should be able to convey that they are going to do everything they can to help people, they’ll throw a few elbows of necessary, they’ll get bloodied and bruised and do what it takes to help people.
No more “but Republicans blocked us” excuses. The Dem president should personally go to the house chamber and occupy it until a vote is taken. Dems leaders should round up union memebers and storm the board rooms of corporations funding Republicans blocking economic policies. Dems should be visibly fighting for people. No more moderate squishes.
No more “but Republicans blocked us” excuses.
Right? How much failure do they expect their constituency to tolerate? Especially when the other side is constantly like “fuck yes we blocked it, because fuck you!”.
My brother was doing this earlier.
I was criticizing the DNC, and he would agree, but then start trotting out “but the Republicans blocked them on that,” or “the Republican media made that look worse,” and so on.
And I called him on it every single time: stop letting them get away with that excuse, the electorate are tired of it! Hold them accountable for failing to be more popular than fascism!
Even giving them the benefit of the doubt of “Republicans blocked them,” ok… It’s been since at least Obama they’ve been doing that, why can’t a party of Harvard and Yale law school graduates not come up with a counter strategy to that after, hmmm, over a decade?
Because they don’t want to. I’ve been pretty sure for a while now that the two parties are playing an elaborate game of Good Cop, Bad Cop with the American public, while both pursuing the same agenda.
I pinned this. I don’t know if that’s the right thing to do or not, but I feel like being impartial is a trait honored only by the left and not the right, and look at where that’s gotten us as a country.
Perhaps it’s time to say to hell with impartiality, and call out poor policy for what it is. Wherever and whenever.
this. yes please. all the people cheering about never being able to do this through democratic processes like some revolution fantasy. can we try stealing this political party and putting farmer/labor back in the name please? people out here acting like even our small town police departments arnt better armed than some counties. doing this the fast way is only ever gonna end in blood and failure when 70mil people love the fasciat for the fascism.
