• sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 days ago

    I do not blame Democrats for running a bad campaign.

    I do:

    1. no primary
    2. select the candidate who dropped out early due to terrible polling in 2020
    3. have pretty vague set of campaign policies
    4. go after celebs instead of appealing to people facing actual issues

    What they should have done is:

    1. run a primary, with Biden choosing to retire instead of seek reelection
    2. select the candidate voters actually want
    3. have a clear set of campaign policies
    4. appeal to everyday people with even an ounce of charisma

    The main issue people seemed to care about was inflation. The Democratic candidate really needed to attack that head on by explaining why inflation got bad, how it’s better, and what they’ll do to help wages continue to catch up. But instead, Harris made vague promises to “fight price gouging” (that’s not what’s actually going on) and give handouts to people to buy houses.

    That said, there’s no way any Democrat would’ve won my state, so I voted my conscience by picking a third party instead of picking either unqualified candidates. I just wonder how many people felt completely uninspired by Harris like I was, and I can’t help but think that cost her the election.

    • fsxylo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      17 days ago

      I resent the idea that people need to be dazzled and appealed to in order to not sell the country out. Absolutely no integrity. No intelligence.

      Hence why I called all of you stimulus eater organisms. Paramecium. Fucking amoebas.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 days ago

        You don’t need to “dazzle” to win elections, you just need to be very clear about what you’ll actually do if elected. Existing isn’t enough to win votes.

        I did quite a bit of research before the election, and I still can’t tell you anything concrete that Harris plans to do, not even in the first 100 days of being elected. Here’s the best I got:

        • ban “price gouging” - what does this mean? Price caps? I don’t think she’s that crazy, this feels empty
        • taxes - these are somewhat concrete, but new revenue will likely be low because wealthy people are good at avoiding taxes
        • immigration - one of her major jobs as VP was border security, yet she didn’t do much, so I question how committed she actually is to her proposed changes, nor do I know if she wants to increase or decrease net immigration

        So, her plans are either vague or seem ineffective, so what would she actually do in office? It’s not clear, and it seems like she’s running just because the DNC needs someone to run. I don’t want a President who is running just because their party said so, I want a President who sees actual problems and has a plan to resolve them.

        That said, my vote absolutely doesn’t matter because my state has consistently gone to Republicans, and will consistently go to Republicans for the foreseeable future, so I don’t know what people in swing states think. But what I do know is that her campaign was entirely uninteresting.