Tech behemoth OpenAI has touted its artificial intelligence-powered transcription tool Whisper as having near “human level robustness and accuracy.”

But Whisper has a major flaw: It is prone to making up chunks of text or even entire sentences, according to interviews with more than a dozen software engineers, developers and academic researchers. Those experts said some of the invented text — known in the industry as hallucinations — can include racial commentary, violent rhetoric and even imagined medical treatments.

Experts said that such fabrications are problematic because Whisper is being used in a slew of industries worldwide to translate and transcribe interviews, generate text in popular consumer technologies and create subtitles for videos.

More concerning, they said, is a rush by medical centers to utilize Whisper-based tools to transcribe patients’ consultations with doctors, despite OpenAI’ s warnings that the tool should not be used in “high-risk domains.”

  • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    86
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    27 days ago

    Why is generative AI even needed for audio transcription? We’ve had decent voice recognition tools for years even on cheap consumer grade stuff.

      • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        27 days ago

        Because with normal algorithms you have someone to blame.

        AI is a trick to hide when you steer the results the way you want.

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      27 days ago

      No, we really haven’t had on-device voice recognition that meets any definition of “decent”. Anything reasonable phones out to “the cloud” for decent voice recognition.

      • LavenderDay3544@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        26 days ago

        So? I’d rather have my software talk to a server than be downright wrong just so another business can climb onto the AI bandwagon.

        • Szyler@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          25 days ago

          You can’t do that with personal information like the ones doctors needs transcribed. It has to be local.

          • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            23 days ago

            Reality is more nuanced than this. You can absolutely be HIPAA compliant while using “cloud” servers as long as they are sufficiently isolated and secured. The requirements are definitely insufficient to protect your data from a Motivated State Actor™ but they are good enough to keep your data away from an abusive family member or crazy ex. I have worked on systems that handle patient data as well as other systems with restrictions I can’t discuss and I can assure you patient data is much easier to move around and handle compared to state secrets.

            Edit: funny story, I just got back from a doctor appointment where they asked me to sign a consent form for recording and transcription of the visit by a computer system. It’s definitely happening, in practice.

  • sbv@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    edit-2
    27 days ago

    Some examples

    In this example, the speaker said, “as the um, the, her father dies not too long after he remarried….” while the program transcribes that as " It’s fine. It’s just too sensitive to tell. She does die at 65….”

    In this example, the speaker said, “and after she got the telephone he began to pray” while the program transcribes that as “I feel like I’m going to fall. I feel like I’m going to fall, I feel like I’m going to fall….”

    • Sludgehammer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      edit-2
      27 days ago

      Wow, that’s bad. I thought it would be more of a “confusing a sentence for a similar sounding one” type thing but from the above and the article it’s just generating semi-believable text and sticking them into the transcriptions.

    • BluesF@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      27 days ago

      This one was wild:

      In an example they uncovered, a speaker said, “He, the boy, was going to, I’m not sure exactly, take the umbrella.”

      But the transcription software added: “He took a big piece of a cross, a teeny, small piece … I’m sure he didn’t have a terror knife so he killed a number of people.”

      From picking up and object to mass murder lmao. Not even close!

    • JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      27 days ago

      Sounds less like transcribing word for word, and more like attempting to summarize and parse meaning on the fly. AIS have notoriously little grasp on reasoning and logic, so it’s interesting how the output holds up in a court of law.

  • QuadratureSurfer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    27 days ago

    As someone who uses Whisper fairly often, it’s obvious that they’ve trained off of a bunch of YouTube videos.

    Most of the time it’s very accurate, but there have definitely been a few times in long transcription sessions where it will randomly hallucinate that someone is saying “Don’t forget to like and subscribe!” When nothing was said anywhere near that.

    • rustydrd@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      27 days ago

      That’s hilarious. I just love how AI is basically like a 6-year-old who weaves his favorite new expressions into everything without fully understanding what they mean.

  • linearchaos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    27 days ago

    Ml is currently best used as a tool for helping a real human do work. It has to be managed and governed and checked after. It’s still capable of amplifying the amount of work we can do, But it’s kind of like having to have an architect look after engineering work, you can’t just pass the buck and pretend that it’s going to be fine.