"A Maryland Republican who leads a right-wing coalition in Congress says North Carolina’s legislature should consider awarding Electoral College votes to former President Donald Trump before citizens’ votes are counted, according to Politico.
Rep. Andy Harris, the chairman of the Freedom Caucus, made the comments at a dinner on Thursday, saying the idea “makes a lot of sense” because the western part of the state, a rural area where Trump is popular, is still dealing with the impact of Hurricane Helene."
And I want to retire at 38 and marry Aubrey Plaza. Fuck off, clown.
Even suggesting this should mean he never works in politics again as it is clearly illegal and against the will of the people. But we know that’s never gonna fucking happen since the Republicans love to ignore our electoral structure when they don’t like it.
“When we Repubs deliberately block voters from voting the nation must accept those results. But if that same thing happens because of a climate disaster we must reject those results. Unless the climate disaster hits a blue area, in which case we must accept the results.”
Ooh, they’re scared.
That’s not very freedom of them
Any excuse to impose their Christo fascist agenda and put their orange fuerer on the throne
This is so absurd I can’t even be witty about it.
Nazis kill humor, we don’t let them win.
Go to darker places :D
Subverting the will of the people “makes a lot of sense” says fascist from another state.
Removed by mod
Nah, he should be tried and hanged by the state to give a warning to any future fascists who suggest ignoring the vote of the people.
North Carolina was the first state to secede before the start of the Civil War. These dipshits can’t help themselves.
*South Carolina
Shit my bad
Removed, I get the sentiment, but no advocating violence. That’s how this shit happens:
Fair
Fuck. No.
If someone was smart they would have asked the 101st to dust off the old 2003 Iraqi voting procedures. They’re there and they have that knowledge base squirreled away somewhere. But no, instead we’re just going to assume things.
USA Today - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for USA Today:
Wiki: reliable - There is consensus that staff-written articles on USA Today are generally reliable. Editors note the publication’s robust editorial process and its centrist alignment. Some content is written by contributors with minimal editorial oversight, and is generally unreliable.
MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America
Search topics on Ground.News
