A new poll suggests that Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein is drawing more voters from former President Donald Trump than from Vice President Kamala Harris.

According to a Noble Predictive Insights survey released last week, Harris holds a narrow lead over Trump in a hypothetical three-way race. With Stein on the ballot, Harris’ lead expands, pointing to a potential spoiler effect similar to what many Democrats blamed Stein for doing to Hillary Clinton in the 2016 election.

For Trump, the emergence of Stein as a potential spoiler may be a critical factor in battleground states, where even a small shift in votes could determine the outcome. For Harris, Stein’s candidacy could paradoxically provide an unexpected advantage, drawing votes from Trump and narrowing his pathway to victory.

  • Ledivin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    34
    ·
    1 month ago

    Insanity. Anyone willing to switch to Stein should be at least as willing to switch to Harris. Someone get this goddamned grifter out of politics

    • Naryn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      People are allowed to stand for election without engaging in your idiotic 2 party system

      • Ledivin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        1 month ago

        You’re allowed to do whatever you want, I just want you to understand that you’re choosing to literally do nothing 🤷‍♂️ you’re not making a stand, you’re not sending a message, and you’re not enacting change. You’re voting for Donald Trump while making yourself feel like you’re fighting an ideological battle.

        • Naryn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          I’m not even fucking American 😂. I just believe that people have the right to stand and vote for a legitimate candidate.

            • Naryn@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              Of course they are

              Not being likely to win doesn’t make them illegitimate.

              The UK is a FPTP system with 7.5 significant parties

              • Ledivin@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                The UK is a FPTP system with 7.5 significant parties

                … I’m not sure how to break this to you, but the UK is a monarchy and has literally never elected their leader.

                FPTP isn’t nearly as problematic in a system with distributed representation like Parliament, the Senate, or the House. It is massively problematic when electing a singular leader.

                • Naryn@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  It is massively problematic when electing a singular leader.

                  No, it’s not. That’s how all of the elections you just listed work. That’s how first past the post works.

    • Fidel_Cashflow@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      1 month ago

      democracy enjoyers when people vote for candidates that better represent their positions: 😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡

      • Grapho@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        Español
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 month ago

        Donald Trump is a threat to democracy 😭😭😭 now shut up and vote for the candidate, peasant. You’ll have a primary when you earn it.

        • Lightor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 month ago

          I love how the ml community plays off how big a threat Trump is. History repeating itself.

          • Grapho@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            Español
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Everyone knows that he’s a fascist. We also know Kamala and her cabinet is gonna be hardly better, so if you’re gonna vote, don’t waste it on a genocide enabler.

            We already know all the talking points of “pushing her left”, we know y’all ain’t gonna do shit, because you didn’t do it with Biden and you certainly wouldn’t have done it with Obama, it’s always people who voted third party out there organizing while y’all wait for the next election to come around for you to pretend you’re doing something.

      • Lightor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 month ago

        My best friend best represents my position but voting for him does nothing. Rigid morals that have no impact on improving anything are pointless.

      • Ledivin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I’m sorry that I live in reality and like to focus on actual outcomes instead the little butterflies I get when I make empty idealistic speeches.

        Getting Trump elected better represents your position? Then by all means - that’s the only thing your vote can actually accomplish in her bucket.

      • Ledivin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        1 month ago

        Democracy enjoyers understand that this version of democracy doesn’t care about third parties 🤷‍♂️ vote for the lesser evil and campaign locally for vote reform

        • sweetpotato@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          I’m not voting for the “lesser evil” when the “lesser evil” commits a genocide. There is no dilemma when we are counting genocides. When do you start realising that both are serving the 1% interests? When does this end - if the dems commit 3 genocides and the republicans 4? If the dems commit 10 and the republicans 11? The red line is long crossed.

          Don’t tell us what to do lmfao.

          • Ledivin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Congrats, your actions likely lead to even more Palestinian deaths. Yay, you “took a stand.” The extra dead will be so thankful.

            • sweetpotato@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              It’s so funny that you think the democrats aren’t the genocidal maniacs that have unconditionally supported and armed Israel. It doesn’t get much worse than this, Israel has got literally everything it has asked for lmao. The problem is you thinking they are in any way holding back, but go off. As Joe said, no president has supported Israel as much as I did.

              Tell us how not so evil the democrats, which are funded by the military industrial complex more than the republicans, are. Tell us how they work for our interests, not the oligarchs, please.

              I’ve said this a million times, if the two candidates were Hitler and Hitler again, but he funded a little bit more the healthcare system who would you vote for? None is the answer. When the dilemma consists of ideologies and political/social trajectories that are 100% opposite to your ideal ones, the lesser evil doesn’t exist.

              Don’t blame the dead on the people who have done more than the 99% for the cause, I can’t take you seriously that way. You can blame the oligarchs and the fascists/liberals who don’t care.

              • Ledivin@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                the democrats, which are funded by the military industrial complex more than the republicans

                [citation needed]

                Tell us how they work for our interests, not the oligarchs, please.

                Yes, they’re all oligarchs. Stein included - her net worth is nearly 10x Harris’s and Walz’s combined, you fucking dolt. You’re not moving the needle, you’re just helping a worse candidate gain office.

                I’ve said this a million times, if the two candidates were Hitler and Hitler again, but he funded a little bit more the healthcare system who would you vote for? None is the answer.

                Yes, I would fucking vote for Healthcare Hitler. I don’t care that you feel bad while doing it, i care about what the potential outcomes are. You get hitler either way, why would you not make a choice that leads to a better future?

                You’re so concerned with your own feelings that you’re actively trying to make everyone’s lives worse just so you don’t feel bad. The only positive that your vanity vote provides anyone is that your fragile feelings are protected.

                • Fidel_Cashflow@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  sorry, I don’t vote for hitlers :/ if Harris wanted me to vote for her this election, she could’ve run on not being Hitler (as 101,000 uncommitted voters in Michigan, a very important swing state, asked her to), but she didn’t, so I won’t. I really hope her strategy of courting all 6 moderate republicans in the country at the expense of anyone to the left of the party works out, but if 2016 is anything to go off of, it won’t.

                • sweetpotato@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  30 days ago

                  Here’s your citation:

                  https://www.opensecrets.org/industries/indus?ind=D

                  Democrat Senators are funded more by the military than the republican ones, and that’s only the above the table money. And before you say I’m cherry picking, I know I am. I’m not trying to argue that republicans are better, they are not. I’m just giving perspective on how little they differ.

                  I don’t care if Stein is an oligarch, she very well could be, but I never advocated for her. In only advocate for not voting the two systemic, imperial, neoliberal parties. Also I never talked about Harris or Trump’s personal wealth. Having a couple millions in the bank doesn’t make you an oligarch. Oligarchs are the actually super rich people that these parties necessarily serve, like I’ve explained. It has to do with their actions and their party’s ties and actions. That’s not a serious argument. But I don’t know about Stein’s history and what she has done. If you think she checks the boxes above, don’t vote for her either. I’m not deifying anyone.

                  As for the last part, which is the actually important one, no matter how much you try to make it about feelings and repeat it, you unfortunately will never make anyone believe this. If I thought it would help Palestinians to vote for Harris, my feelings would tell me to vote for her, it’s as simple as that. But you are so deeply fried in the oligarchy propaganda that you can’t understand what I already pointed out. That you blatantly assume that the democrats made any non-negligible concession on that matter that the republicans wouldn’t and so we should vote for them. This is 100% wrong.

                  I am not complicit with this oligarchy system we are living in, not only in regards to the genocide. So I’m not voting for them, I am not giving my approval. They can’t produce any meaningful change, they are both far right neoliberal parties.

                  And if you want to vote for Hitler, I don’t really care, I am assuming you say this now because it strengthens your argument, but the difference would be so negligible (as is now) that the fact that there is one more vote on them signifying approval has to be more detrimental than the bad Hitler coming to power. There are limits to the harm the lesser evil is allowed to cause, and you willing to vote for Hitler doesn’t change that.

    • doingthestuff@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      My wife is one. She voted for Trump in '16. She won’t vote for him again there’s no way she’ll vote for Kamala.

    • Lightor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      Whenever I’m in an ml community I love seeing what’s down voted and why. Always a trip…