Even though this would be a win for all Americans – and humanity – it apparently did not outweigh the politics of making a Democrat look good. This is the definition of party over country.

I’m a doctor.So is my mother. When she got cancer, I realized how little that mattered.

Republicans have stated budget cuts need to be made with an ever-growing debt. But where was this attitude when tax cuts for the wealthy were on the table in 2017? They don’t have to look at patients in the eye and break the devastating news that they have cancer. They don’t have to treat cancers that block intestines or drown a patient’s lungs in fluid.

  • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Unless you’re spending all your money on cancer research, you can always spend more on it. At some point, you have to draw a line and someone will accuse you of deliberately refusing to cure cancer no matter where you draw that line. It’s plausible to me that the line should be where the Democrats rather than the Republicans want it, and it’s even plausible that Republicans are acting in bad faith. However, this article presents no evidence for either claim.

    • ganksy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I think that’s a pretty reasonable response. Maybe not so much that cancer in general is over funded but I’d be willing to bet a breast cancer cure probably isn’t any closer now than it would be with another billion. It’s definitely a bad look for the GOP though. I see a lot of We the people… bs bumper stickers with the f*** cancer! stickers.

      • Quereller@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Spending one billion on breast cancer drug discovery/ development would probably lead to one more drug which increases survival by 10-20%. Or if spend on fundamental research it would lead to a lot of additional knowledge. Which might lead in about 10 years (and a few billions more) to a few drugs which increase survival a further 30-40 %.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      At some point, you have to draw a line and someone will accuse you of deliberately refusing to cure cancer no matter where you draw that line.

      I’m sorry, I can’t hear you over the $1T we spend on national security annually. Somehow, we’re always able to justify more than the year before.

      But $2.8B over ten years on an effort to improve health care treatments for one of the most deadly maladies in the US? My god! That’s over 3% of our Ukraine military aid budget! We need to draw a line somewhere!

  • smokin_shinobi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Need to be putting this on billboards in red states. Let everybody who has lost family or has family battling cancer know what they have done.

    • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Really shows how ass backwards the US really is.

      Cuba, a country that the US has tried to destroy for over 60 years now with economic sanctions, has better healthcare than the US, aka the richest nation on the planet.

      There is no excuse for the state of healthcare in the US. We really have some evil, greedy people deciding to let people die so they can have more money.

      • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Also Cuba didn’t really do anything? They only truly alligned themselves with the communist block after the united states decided to start being shitty to them out of nothing but paranoia. Classic tyrant looking everywhere for conspiracies and causing some to appear moment.