• njm1314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 month ago

    I can’t imagine a lot of 40-year-olds are still planning to have kids so this number seems a little suspect to me.

      • Zahille7@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Correct me if I’m wrong, but doesn’t basic biology say that it gets more dangerous for people to have kids the older they are? Let alone the virility of men over 40.

      • Girru00@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Thanks for this, so I redid the math using the two youngest categories (up to 34 years old) and the % goes from 21% to 26% 🤷‍♂️

        • eatthecake@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          It only surveyed people who don’t have children. Says on the left ‘Do not have children, n = 1300’. This result says nothing about the general intention to have children as those with children in each age group are excluded. Naturally, as people age, the number who still think they’re going to have children goes down.

        • vxx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          The light blue section doesn’t count towards either yes or no, right? Because it’s the “I don’t know” answer.

          I was sitting here wondering how they came to 21% at all without only looking at the oldest category, and even then it’s only a fourth that would not get children.

          • Girru00@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            For sure, good call out, I think they just mean only 21% of people feel sure about wanting kids, and if we remove the age bias it goes to 26%. Honestly it would be more interesting to compare the categories to answers from 10, 20 or 30 years ago to have a better benchmark for how we could interperet this.

            • vxx@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              Yeah, I got distracted by the headline and didn’t notice the bottom text that says it exactly that way.

              I suppose I’m not alone, because I doubt it would’ve been interesting enough to make my feed without the confusion.