• lohky@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    134
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    That’s not weird. That’s how functional societies reconcile when they aren’t subjected to endless propaganda and fear mongering.

    • Zexks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      No what’s ‘weird’ is so many not understanding that ‘weird’ isn’t automatically negative. or maybe more disturbing that so many automatically go there at first instinct.

      • jollyrogue@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        “Surprising” or “unexpected” are probably a better words due to connotations and all.

      • jollyrogue@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        True. Ideally the Amish would have a “immigrated”, assimilated, and become another tribe in the area hundreds of years ago. However, this is still a better outcome than the tribes still litigating treaties signed hundreds of years ago, like in Oklahoma.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Well no, the Amish were settlers too. They’re just working with the Indians instead of in spite of the Indians.

        • dubious@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          they were all born there. we need to stop considering ancestors and consider the living.

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            We can stop when we actually give them the same opportunities and protections white people get. You don’t get to oppress a population for 500 years and then just act like nothing happened.

  • Donebrach@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is local politics in action. In a federation this is protected. In a federation this could also be forced on all federated states or banned. In a federal system it is also allowed that damaging actions are outlawed or embraced and cherished by the state. It is all imperfect but the entire idea is the hope that all the various levels of legal authority check and balance themselves for the benefit of the people and are accountable to wrote law.

    I am just writing this for people to maybe remember that this is how a federation (see: The United States of America) is fundamentally supposed to function.