• Redex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Ok sure, what do you want them to do instead then? 80% of their income is reliant on a tech giant’s grace and is seemingly more and more likely to be cutoff soon. They need to survive somehow, and every monetised service they tried flopped thusfar.

    • doleo@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      How about not have a multi-million-dollar-costing CEO? Seems a bit rich (pun intended) for a supposed non-profit org.

      • LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah I’m not defending that but CEO pay only rounds to like 1% of their total expenditures. Developing a browser is expensive.

        • doleo@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          only 1%? That’s about on par with a fortune 500 company, which supposedly Mozilla is not.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Ideas:

      • directly ask for donations, and actually use those donations to fund browser development
      • build an add-on to pay sites instead of seeing ads - Mozilla could take a cut here
      • push harder on existing, optional add-ons that generate revenue, like their VPN

      But the article here reads like, “we’ve tried nothing and we’re all out of ideas. Have ads…”