But in a national electronic poll that was open from July 24 through September 15, Trump held an advantage (59.6% to 34%) over Harris among union members. In a separate union survey, Trump also led Harris — this time 58% to 31%.
It’s still genuinely disturbing to me that Harris has a history of strong support of unions and is making it a part of her campaign while the orange turd is tied to completely eliminating unions…yet still has a strong advantage in union polls. My cousin is IBEW and said their union leaders are outright telling them they should vote Harris because the orange turd will kill unions
I thought it made complete sense. These guys are in their trucks all day listening to talk radio, of course they’re going to prefer Trump.
Oh I thought that was Colin Robinson at first glance
Business Insider - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for Business Insider:
MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America
Wikipedia about this sourceSearch topics on Ground.News
AOC is nosediving her reputation into the ground. They needs to stop demanding people to vote Democrat. Give unions what they want. Give them something to vote for.
Democrats are starting to act like vote entitled #brats.
y’all remember when AOC was the lefty being punched at? Now she’s the one always punching left. I used to want her for pres too sheesh.
Punching left at the guy who attended the RNC?
At the guy who tried to represent his union, that was 60% in favor of Trump so rather than endorse him declined to endorse any candidate?
Yes we are in fact talking about the same person. AOC is stupid to call him out as his reasoning is sound and his non-dorsement helps the D party more than a trump one.
Do you really think he should endorse Harris when his members are only 35% in favor of his doing so? I have a hunch his members would take issue with that
But if your argument is that he went to the RNC as an appeal to teamsters who support Trump (aka not lefties), and that he is also choosing not to endorse either candidate on behalf of those teamsters, then that isn’t an appeal to further-left-than-democrats politics, it’s an appeal to centrism.
My point then being
Now she’s the one always punching left
Doesn’t really make sense in this context
I suppose you have a point. Maybe punching left is not accurate.
Thing is tho he didn’t go to the RNC l as an appeal to teamsters, he asked both RNC and DNC to be a speaker and only the RNC called back. DNC ghosted his ass.
When at the RNC, he spoke about the importance of both parties to respect workers rights. He and other execs went to both camps (and biden before he stepped down) as they always do to try and extract promises in return for an endorsement.
They didn’t get any promises from either camp though. He could have gone with his “constituents” polling numbers and endorsed Trump but he did not.
He was the first acting teamster president to ever speak at the RNC, that’s a huge deal regardless of whether he was also expecting to speak at the DNC. Especially given how anti-union the republican party generally is.
Either it was an appeal to conservative teamsters, or he himself is quietly moderate or conservative.
Could you please explain to me why you believe this is the case? I guess I’m confused and want to understand your position.
She’s always been a sheepdog.
