• aalvare2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    But if your argument is that he went to the RNC as an appeal to teamsters who support Trump (aka not lefties), and that he is also choosing not to endorse either candidate on behalf of those teamsters, then that isn’t an appeal to further-left-than-democrats politics, it’s an appeal to centrism.

    My point then being

    Now she’s the one always punching left

    Doesn’t really make sense in this context

    • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      I suppose you have a point. Maybe punching left is not accurate.

      Thing is tho he didn’t go to the RNC l as an appeal to teamsters, he asked both RNC and DNC to be a speaker and only the RNC called back. DNC ghosted his ass.

      When at the RNC, he spoke about the importance of both parties to respect workers rights. He and other execs went to both camps (and biden before he stepped down) as they always do to try and extract promises in return for an endorsement.

      They didn’t get any promises from either camp though. He could have gone with his “constituents” polling numbers and endorsed Trump but he did not.

      • aalvare2@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        He was the first acting teamster president to ever speak at the RNC, that’s a huge deal regardless of whether he was also expecting to speak at the DNC. Especially given how anti-union the republican party generally is.

        Either it was an appeal to conservative teamsters, or he himself is quietly moderate or conservative.