As Julian Assange enjoys his first weekend of freedom in years, there appeared to be no question in the mind of his wife, Stella, about what the family’s priorities were.

The WikiLeaks co-founder would need time to recover, she told reporters after they were reunited in his native Australia, after a deal with US authorities that allowed him to plead guilty to a single criminal count of conspiring to obtain and disclose classified defence documents.

What comes after that is one of the most intriguing questions for anyone familiar with how the site he founded in 2006 utterly changed the nature of whistleblowing. Will it return to its original mission?

James Harkin, the director of the London-based Centre for Investigative Journalism, (said) “In retrospect, it’s striking that everything WikiLeaks published was true – no small feat in the era of “disinformation” – but the tragedy is that much of its energy and ethos has now passed to blowhards and conspiracy theorists. Perhaps, in the light of our tepid new involvements in the Middle East and Ukraine, we need a new WikiLeaks.”

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I am not in any way going to defend what was done to Julian Assange, because it was abhorrent.

    But, based on what he’s done in the past, I’m guessing ‘everything’ will be far more Biden-focused than Trump-focused.

    • anticolonialist@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      If I had dirt on someone that speculated about drone killing me, I would have no problem releasing that dirt. WikiLeaks has never had to retract a story or cables because of bad information, even the DNC couldn’t refute the authenticity of the DNC cables.

    • realitista@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      It is fair to remember, however, that his biggest bombshells were from the Iraq war, which was a decidedly Republican endeavor. But I do agree that he looked more and more like a Russian asset as time went on.

      • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Those bombshells didn’t end the war.

        His leak during the 2016 election changed the course of American history, and was directly coordinated with Russia. That was far more impactful.

        • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          That’s more a comment on how die-hard committed the political class is to perpetual war than anything else.

          Also, while I don’t appreciate Trump being elected… the DNC seems committed to running some of the worst candidates they can find - the fact that there was information that damaging to Clinton that didn’t come out in the primaries is the part we should be mad at.

          • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            I think we should still be mad at foreign adversary nations colluding with one of our politcal parties and a not at all impartial “whistleblower” to turn the tide of a presidential election.

            The emails themselves were barely relevant at all politically. Out of some 30k of them, 3 were found to be inappropriately controlled. Thats hardly an earth shattering discovery.

            The spectacle that Assange, the GOP and Russia manufactured was the issue. It was a coordinated and targeted attack on our democracy, and he deserves to be derided for his outsized part in it.

    • demonsword@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      The man has every reason to hate the USA. Helping getting Trump to power would surely be some sweet revenge, since another Trump presidency will be undoubtely be divisive and harmful

        • demonsword@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          That really is not an excuse for his relationship with Russia.

          The enemy of my enemy is a short-term ally, that might be how he thinks, who knows. I have no side in this fight since I’m not a Assange fanboy and I have nothing but contempt for the USA.

            • demonsword@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              In 2016 he had already spent years hiding inside an embassy. It’s not that hard to conceive that hatred tends to build over time.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 months ago

                Okay, but you said it was short-term. That is not short-term. And as far as I know, Wikileaks is still very easy on Russia. So how long is this favoritism of his going to last? Why should that be what Wikileaks is about?

                • demonsword@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Okay, but you said it was short-term. That is not short-term.

                  It was just a conjecture of how Assange might have thought about. I never said that there really is any link between him and Russia. And it was long ago, when he was still hiding inside Ecuador’s embassy, when the hypothetical link between him and Russia was new.

                  And as far as I know, Wikileaks is still very easy on Russia. So how long is this favoritism of his going to last?

                  I doubt he still runs wikileaks. Assange was in jail for years.

                  Why should that be what Wikileaks is about?

                  I don’t know and I don’t really care.

                  • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    He wasn’t in jail. He was in the Ecuadorian embassy. It sounds like you really don’t know the details here.