“After extensive consultation, discussion, and deliberation, the American Muslim 2024 Election Task Force has decided to encourage American Muslims to vote for any presidential candidate of their choosing who supports a permanent ceasefire in Gaza and a US arms embargo on the Israeli government, such as candidates Dr Jill Stein, Dr Cornel West or Chase Oliver,” read the statement, obtained by Middle East Eye.

The statement was written by the American Muslim 2024 Election Task Force, an umbrella group formed this year that consists of a number of prominent Muslim organisations including the political arms of Americans for Justice in Palestine (AJP), Cair, and the US Council of Muslim Organizations.

“We cannot endorse Vice President Kamala Harris’ candidacy because of her refusal to even consider imposing the arms embargo on the Israeli government required by US laws and her failure to promise any other changes whatsoever to President Biden’s failed policy of steadfast financial, diplomatic and military support for Israel’s genocide in Gaza,” the statement read.

  • anarcho_blinkenist@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    37
    ·
    2 months ago

    Hey, bud, I’m betting the actual Muslims who are affected probably have a better grasp of the situation and their values and associated risks/benefits behind their own advocacy and politics than your (presumably highly privileged) disconnected-from-their-struggle self; and inserting yourself to belittle them as if you know better than they theymselfs what’s ‘good for them,’ is a very chauvinist and colonialist outlook and a reinforcement of white supremacist norms and attitudes. You should try listening rather than projecting and belittling.

    • JaggedRobotPubes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      None of that has anything to do with it.

      This is the issue at hand: https://youtu.be/s7tWHJfhiyo

      There’s a legitimate mathematical limitation on 3rd parties under first past the post voting, the way America does elections. Until we get ranked choice voting and the ability to vote intelligently that it would unlock, failing to vote for Kamala is voting for trump.

      • NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        “failing to vote for Kamala is voting for trump.”

        By that same logic a vote for Harris is a vote against Jill Stein or Cornel West. -I actually like the Green Party, the candidate, and associated policy I’m voting for. –If all you’re concerned about is voting against Trump, then can you honestly argue that you actually like Harris? -I’m betting your answer is ‘no’ seeing that out of ~12 candidates she ranked somewhere behind a wet-blanket in the 2020 Democrat primaries.

    • BlucifersVeinyAnus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Unfortunately we have a 2 party system.

      A or B

      A sucks and B is much worse

      Voting for C or abstaining is a passive endorsement of the greater of the two sucks.

      If you and the Muslim community want to hump for a third party, good, let’s fucken talk about getting that started…

      The day AFTER Election Day. —

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        The day after election day. The day on which you no longer have any leverage.

        Liberals and an inability to grasp electoralism. Name a more iconic duo.

        • BlucifersVeinyAnus@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          2 months ago

          You want a seat at the table you don’t start at the top you start at the bottom.

          Where is the Green Party for the three years preceding each presidential election cycle?

          • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            I don’t believe green voters expect them to win, nor is it possible to work your way up from the bottom in the US electoral system.

      • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        The two party system still allows voters to pressure politicians into appealing to them.

        When the amount of people withholding their vote grows large enough, one of the two parties will cave to win over their vote. They cannot win an election on thin air.

        The question now is whether this important swing-state voter group is appealing enough for Democrats to cave, or they believe they can beat Trump without them.

    • Podunk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      Did you just assume their religion?!? And nationality? And race?

      Shut the fuck up.