Windows 11 is getting out of hand with its push for advertisments, frankly - remember the recent full-screen pop-up to persuade users to install Edge or other Microsoft services? Then another advertisment was placed in the Start menu, and now Microsoft has finally worn my temper thin - with a new Game Pass ad coming to the Settings app.

This will likely arrive in the July update for Windows 11, or at least it’s almost certain to do so. It was present in the latest preview update Microsoft just released for the OS (and quickly paused due to a bug, but that’s another story). It’s also worth noting that the ad has been present in earlier test versions of Windows 11.

  • Grippler@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I wholeheartedly believe that all forma of unsolicited or public advertising should be completely banned. Nothing good comes from it, it is only a nuisance to everyone.

    • sunzu@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      But have you thought about a legal person’s right to fuck your eyes and brains?!

      Also, what about their freedom of speech… Shit lord

        • sunzu@kbin.run
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Because they are not “ads”

          They use the same propaganda tactics that governments in 20th century perfected

          Gets people going

          • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Imagine If I worked for Kellogs and I hired a guy to follow you and yell about how good corn flakes are every time you look at your phone, every time your TV shows go on a break, and every time you pass a billboard in your car, or a marquee on a building. Even if we assume that person does nothing else illegal somehow, that could easily still be harassment, which is definitely not free speech.

            • sunzu@kbin.run
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              Tell that to the courts that’s who decided this degeracy is acceptable.

              Don’t get me started on them spying

              • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 months ago

                I’ve long know I wouldn’t make a good lawyer because you can’t say things like “Listen here you little shit” even when you’re right.

                • sunzu@kbin.run
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Sure way to get some time in the hole haha

                  When corruption is the process, no amount of good argument will win tho.

    • 9point6@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      They should, but that’s never going to happen unless political lobbying is made very illegal (like life ruining and business bankrupting illegal, not slap on the wrist, cost of business illegal)

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      We should be able to charge them for ad time. You want to paint an advertisement on my car you have to pay me. Why should it be any different when you want to put ads on my work computer screen when I’m working with clients?

      • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I get what you’re saying but that still gives them unsolicited permission to post ads in the first place.

        I want an operating system, not an ad system that also happens to be an operating system

      • Grippler@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        A regulatory change would obviously need to prevent them from hiding that kind in intentionally too long legalese TOS. It has to be a clear single acknowledge, not obfuscated or bundled with functionality.

    • andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      And it’s not like w11 is free, the price of a PC with Windows installed comes with its’ license’s costs. It’s not told to the consumer so they won’t even know they are using a product they paid for, for them it’s what a clean basic PC looks like. And that’s what prevents many to care about it the same way they can be frustrated by a paid streaming plan with ads. To take is as a given, and shifting the Overtone’s window of fucked up services even further.