• TargaryenTKE@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Theoretically, sure, it’s possible. I think what’s more likely to happen if Trump fucks up is that Israel will just keep up the attack maybe with slightly less support. It’s not like they are a U.S. State that has to abide by a SCOTUS decision; they are (for good and bad) their own sovereign nation and could WOULD MOST LIKELY make the choice to continue their abhorrent actions, regardless of whatever Trump himself might do.

    The state of Israel is not a “puppet” of the U.S., only able to make a movement when given a command from the White House; it is closer to Frankenstein’s Monster, fully capable of making its own decisions, and sometimes they choose to do evil things (regardless of how ‘justified’ they tell themselves it is). It’s not a 1-to-1 comparison, but I think it’s a better way to understand the whole situation

    • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      An Israel with less support is one that is in more danger of inviting retaliation from its neighbors.

      Of particular interest to me is Egypt, which only cooperates with Israel because of the US. e

      • TargaryenTKE@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I mean, you’re not wrong, but again, it’s extremely unlikely that Israel/US relations sour SO bad that the US wouldn’t step in and help defend an Israel under assault. Again, it’s theoretically possible but very unlikely. Plus, what you said is true regardless of who wins in November, which was my original point

        • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          I don’t see relations souring under Trump, per se, but I do see him fucking up the careful balancing act in that region.

          Furthermore, Israel is becoming so unpopular in the US that direct intervention would destabilize the country.

          If the goal is defeating the US/Israel then electing an incompetent and unpopular president is not a bad result at all.

          • TargaryenTKE@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            I still argue that a second Trump presidency would lead to worse outcomes for everyone involved, perhaps even the entire global population, than a Harris presidency.

            • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              I think a successful Trump presidency would be worse for people all around the world.

              I do not predict success. I think his presidency will be a disaster.

              But ultimately it comes down to how we respond. He won’t fail unless he’s defeated by a mass movement against his presidency.

              • TargaryenTKE@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                I wouldn’t really call his last presidency a successful one, but he still managed to fuck over everyone (except possibly Elon Musk). We can’t let Trump anywhere near that office ever again.

                P.S. I think you and I have fallen to the Leftist Curse of arguing nonstop even though we only disagree on like 1-5% of the conversation