The Meissner's
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
𝕾𝖕𝖎𝖈𝖞 𝕿𝖚𝖓𝖆@lemmy.world to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year ago

Nuclear isn't perfect, but it is the best we have right now.

lemmy.world

external-link
message-square
446
fedilink
26
external-link

Nuclear isn't perfect, but it is the best we have right now.

lemmy.world

𝕾𝖕𝖎𝖈𝖞 𝕿𝖚𝖓𝖆@lemmy.world to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year ago
message-square
446
fedilink
  • 𝙲𝚑𝚊𝚒𝚛𝚖𝚊𝚗 𝙼𝚎𝚘𝚠@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Renewables will not cover your usage.

    False. Multiple countries are already able to run on 100% renewables for prolonged periods of time. The bigger issue is what to do with excess power. Battery solutions can cover moments where renewables produce a bit less power.

    • cqst@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      100% renew

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_renewable_electricity_production

      All the countries that manage 100% renewable power use high levels of hydropower. Which is not an option for many countries and has it’s own ecological problems associated with it.

      Also, these 100% renewable countries have very little electricity requirements.

      https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/electricity/electricity-in-the-us-generation-capacity-and-sales.php

      The United States produces at least produces four million Gigawatt hours of electricity per year. Compare that to some of these “100% renewable” countries.

      • Frokke@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh noes, facts. The bane of all renewables evangelicals…

        Just wait till you have to tell them they’re looking at irrelevant data. Not only are they using specific usecases that are not applicable to a large majority of countries, but they’re also using data that doesn’t support the long term fossil fuel goals.

        Just wait till you tell them how much the electricity requirements will skyrocket once we’re transitioning to EV, dropping fossil fuel heating, cooking, cargo trucks switch to EV, etc etc.

    • Frokke@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      In the summer. In ideal conditions. Lets talk again once you’ve tried 12 continuous months in the heavily populated northern hemisphere. 😉

      • 𝙲𝚑𝚊𝚒𝚛𝚖𝚊𝚗 𝙼𝚎𝚘𝚠@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        We’re nowhere near the potential capacity for energy production from renewables, and already we’re capable of doing 100% renewable power production.

        Potential capacity is really not the issue.

        • Frokke@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          As I said, lets talk once you’ve managed a full winter. 😉

Memes@lemmy.ml

memes@lemmy.ml

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !memes@lemmy.ml

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 184 users / day
  • 281 users / week
  • 1.07K users / month
  • 72 users / 6 months
  • 0 local subscribers
  • 46.1K subscribers
  • 2.04K Posts
  • 7.52K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • ghost_laptop@lemmy.ml
  • sexy_peach@feddit.de
  • Cyclohexane@lemmy.ml
  • Arthur Besse@lemmy.ml
  • BE: 0.19.9
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org