• Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    LoL “stealing”. Are you “stealing” the air you’re breathing right now? That’s a weird choice of word. Anyway.

    But you’re right. If everyone started to live like this, it would be devastating. But when you think about it, think about how many forests were cut down and how much land was taken and transformed just for agriculture around the world just to feed us humans. It’s insane.

    • LordSinguloth@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yes. Stealing. From the taxpayers that maintain that forest. From the public who owns the property.

      Stealing is exactly right. Because while everyone can breathe air, there isn’t enough of that forest to go around if everyone lived like this.

          • andrewth09@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            No it’s not.

            The tragedy of the commons is when too many people use a public resource in a way that is unsustainable. For example, air is not privatized but air pollution impacts everyone who checks notes uses air.

            That’s not to say there aren’t solutions to the Tragedy of the Commons problem and resources cannot be made publicly available, but systems need to be created to manage common resources.

    • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I put it in quotes because I didn’t have a better word. If it’s a public park and I walk in with turf cutter, and take all the grass for my own yard, that’s clearly stealing from everyone.

      How much can I take from a public forest without it being stealing? Can I cut down 1 tree for firewood? 10? How much foraging can I do before local wildlife is affected?