• ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Yeah, make them out of metal, that rolls on metal roads. And those metal tires can carry a ton more weight, so put a lot of people in them who are going the same way.

    Oh right, we already have those.

  • pr06lefs@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Hot take: tire particulates are a conservative anti-EV talking point. “My V8 mustang weighs less than an EV, therefore its better on pollution than a EV because tire particulates”. Totally disregarding the impact of tailpipe emissions.

    • Thetimefarm@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      No it’s not, because conservatives don’t think micro plastics are a problem. Pretty soon there will be truck bros making tiktoks competing to see how quickly they can destroy a set of tires just to “trigger the libs”.

    • Usernameblankface@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      One person I know claimed to have run calculations, and found that the tire dust alone was putting out more pollution than the tires and tailpipe of the average gas car. Idk where they got their numbers or how that could work out, since the average gas car in America is a large truck.

  • uis@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Now how about using iron tires on iron road? And using public transport?

    • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Although I agree that using cars on pointless journeys is a waste and not good for the planet, but using public transport isn’t always an option.

      If I’m travelling 6 miles in to town then I’m taking the tram, but it really isn’t feasible when travelling 40 miles to work and back 3 times a week. Sure there are trains, but I would have to get up an hour earlier, set off an hour earlier, wait 50 minutes for the train home, and get home two hours later. As I would also have to take the tram 40 minutes to the train station and walk 20 mins before that.

      I have a car that I use for work. Outside of that I’m walking or taking public transport.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        If I’m travelling 6 miles in to town then I’m taking the tram, but it really isn’t feasible when travelling 40 miles to work and back 3 times a week.

        “My city is fucking designed wrong so the public transport sucks” isn’t really the rebuttal you think it is. Obviously, the real problem there is your city is fucking designed wrong and the vast majority of people shouldn’t have to be living 40 miles away from work to begin with!

        • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          I live in Manchester. Which is an amazing city for public transport. I work in Cheshire which isn’t.

          As I said. To take the train. I must walk from my town 20 minutes to the Metrolink, then take that 35-40 minutes into Manchester, then take the train 45 minutes to Cheshire, and then finally walk another 20 minutes to the office. That’s without counting any waiting periods in between. VS 75 minute drive.

          We haven’t even factored in it rains 70% of days here. Or even the cost.

          You can moan at my boss for not allowing fully WFH. But my point was some people can’t just commute everywhere. Perhaps when I’m more experienced I can find a job closer to home or more remote, but for now this is all I can do.

          Edit: I have nothing to rebut to people online. I was merely giving an example. Get off your high horse mate.

      • uis@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        wait 50 minutes for the train home

        Same was in Moscow until Moscow Central Ring was opened and people said “wait, so trains can arrive at 2 minutes interval? Why suburban trains doesn’t do same?”. And that is how D1-D4 were born with 5m peak hours interval instead of few hours of lunch break.

  • Delta_V@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    So this big breakthrough in tire technology is . . . making them harder and reducing their grip?

  • manualoverride@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    What kind of backhanded EV misinformation bullshit is this?

    Electric, gas, petrol, hydrogen, diesel, cooking oil or vodka; what you put in your car to make it go makes no difference to the tires or the wear.

    • mox@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      From the article:

      In an EV era, tires are becoming the greatest emitters of particulate matter

      The point being that electric drops tailpipe emissions to zero, making tires the next target for reducing emissions.

      • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        That sentence and headline are completely wrong though. Tires already are one of the greatest emitters of particulate matter even with ICE cars in mind, because this is a general car issue and cannot really be directly resolved. An improvement would be less weight. If cars were smaller and consequently lighter, then they’d pollute less. But unfortunately we are still going the opposite direction and cars are still getting fatter and fatter, just like the people driving them.