Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez recently made headlines for calling perennial Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein “predatory” and “not serious.” AOC is right.

Giving voters more choices is a good thing for democracy. But third-party politics isn’t performance art. It’s hard work — which Stein is not doing. As AOC observed: “[When] all you do is show up once every four years to speak to people who are justifiably pissed off, but you’re just showing up once every four years to do that, you’re not serious.”

To be clear: AOC was not critiquing third parties as a whole, or the idea that we need more choices in our democracy. In fact, AOC specifically cited the Working Families Party as an example of an effective third party. The organization I lead, MoveOn, supports their 365-day-a-year efforts to build power for a pro-voter, multi-party system. And I understand third parties’ power to activate voters hungry for alternatives: I myself volunteered for Ralph Nader in 2000, and that experience helped shape my lifelong commitment to people-first politics.


Register to vote: https://vote.gov/

  • Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    And you have most likely decided out of your own will to remain a member of a country supporting genocide. You likely continue to pay taxes, that then go on to support genocide.

    • index@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Are you really compare the two things? People do not decide to be born in america and the average person doesn’t have the luxury to go in another country. This person decided to be a member of a party supporting a genocide just like someone decides to become a trump supporter

      • Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Are you really compare the two things?

        Yes

        This person decided to be a member of a party supporting a genocide just like someone decides to become a trump supporter

        Here’s the thing though, Americans don’t have the luxury of going to another party, because only two of them are viable. So if you want to make political change your choices are incredibly restricted.

        • index@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          There’s plenty of parties and you can make your own too. Perhaps they don’t pay or make you popular as much as red and blue but that’s another story.

          • Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Unless it is a local election, you have no chance of winning unless you’re in one of the two main parties. So candidates almost always choose to join one of the parties.

            • index@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              I guess these who are in for the seat in power and not to back their ideals do just that.

              • Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                I disagree. While that’s probably the case nine times out of ten, just because somebody is in a higher power seat doesn’t mean they got there because they’re greedy.

                There needs to be change and protections at higher levels of government too.