• TrippyHippyDan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I think you’re even being too short-sighted on that because that’s what they did with Biden.

    Harris was a succession problem that they created by not giving Biden a proper primary to begin with.

    • Linkerbaan@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Not at all. Harris is as much of a corporate ghoul as Biden.

      2019 - ‘More AIPAC Than J Street’: Kamala Harris Runs to the Right on Foreign Policy

      In her very first foreign policy vote in January 2017, for instance, Harris sided with President Trump in criticizing the outgoing President Obama’s refusal to veto an otherwise-unanimous, very modest, and largely symbolic UN Security Council resolution on Israeli settlements. Among other things, that resolution reiterated previous Security Council calls for Israel to stop expanding its illegal settlements in the occupied West Bank, which violate the Fourth Geneva Convention and a landmark ruling by the International Court of Justice.

      • TrippyHippyDan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        What does that have to do with the fact that they didn’t give Biden a primary removing any good options besides just raising his vice president when he dropped?