• Serinus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      This isn’t even close to the other, actual stochastic terrorism they’ve done before.

      If they were going to get charged for it, it shouldn’t be this one.

      Now, whoever runs the Libertarian Party of New Hampshire account, that feels like an actual crime.

      The cat thing should disqualify him as president because he’s blatantly lying. But it’s not a crime.

    • newfie@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Name the criminal statute he should be charged with violating.

      Agreed that he likely does not have a 1st amendment defense. But you still need a specific criminal statute to charge him with. I am unaware of any that he has likely violated with his xenophobic remarks

      Demagoguery that targets a marginalized group is an American tradition. It is unlikely that he committed any crime

      • cogman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Ohio could possibly sue him civilly because of the bomb threats that caused them to shut down schools. That’s the best I got.

        If anyone is hurt over this, then they likely have standing for a civil suit (see Alex Jones).

        Criminal it’s definitely more tricky. Trump will likely get away with telling his followers to storm the capitol, so I doubt “eating cats and dogs” comes close to the same standard.

        Once upon a time, admitting to something like this would have been an impeachable offense. But that’s long sailed as something Congress would fairly enforce.