Mexico is poised to amend its constitution this weekend to require all judges to be elected as part of a judicial overhaul championed by the outgoing president but slammed by critics as a blow to the country’s rule of law.

The amendment passed Mexico’s Congress on Wednesday, and by Thursday it already had been ratified by the required majority of the country’s 32 state legislatures. President Andrés Manuel López Obrador said he would sign and publish the constitutional change on Sunday.

Legal experts and international observers have said the move could endanger Mexico’s democracy by stacking courts with judges loyal to the ruling Morena party, which has a strong grip on both Congress and the presidency after big electoral wins in June.

  • paf0@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    I would prefer appointments approved by Congress with both term limits and a maximum age. Judges should have minimal political incentive.

    • Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Wouldn’t that just make it partisan? The only way any system of appointing judges can work is if its all done in good faith. Considering the corruption in Mexico you seem fucked either way. Not that America is any better.

      • paf0@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        I think it’s going to be partisan regardless. Unfortunately, from this article, it’s not clear to me the length of their term. If they constantly have to seek reelection then I believe it would be even more partisan than being appointed for a set term.