Twenty-nine percent of non-voters who supported Biden in 2020 said U.S. support for the genocide was the top reason they sat the 2024 election, according to a survey by YouGov.

    • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      How could the dems know that genocide is unpopular??! What’s next, are you going to tell me canceling all student debt would have been popular? Throwing Trump in prison? Rescheduling cannabis? Not campaigning on building the wall and closing the border?

  • PillowFort@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    It’s doubtable this poll has uncovered something that countless other post-election polls have missed.

    It’s more likely that the pollster is biased. This is the first sentence of About section of the pollster’s website: “Palestinians, like all people, are entitled to live in freedom and with their human rights respected. Yet, for too long, the US government has funded and enabled Israel’s denial of Palestinian human rights.”

      • PillowFort@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        I dug into the survey and it appears they intentionally skewed the results by the word choice and order of the questions.

        For example: “5. Do you [favor or oppose] the Biden administration approving taxpayer-funded weapons and other military support to Israel, even if the U.S. government has no control over whether the Israeli military uses those weapons on innocent civilians in Gaza, or are you undecided?”

        The wording in that question will predispose a respondent to view the Biden administration negatively, even if that wasn’t the main reason that a respondent chose not to vote.

        Worse, they asked that question before they asked about sitting out the election, predisposing the respondent to view that topic as more significant in their decision to sit out the election.

        If the purpose of a poll was to figure out the reason for not voting, this is not a scientific way to do it. It predictably would skew results as it appears to have done.

  • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    11 months ago

    So fucking idiots were idiots, as usual. And they believe they’re somehow morally superior while handing Gaza over to Israel in the process. As if Trump and the Republican party was the better option, they care even less about Gaza than the Biden admin.

    This is why the Dems and progressive both keep losing everything, too many dumb fucks that think they’re making a difference while just making things worse with inaction.

    • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      You know, while I am a fan of choosing the lesser evil, when the “lesser evil” is genocide, maybe it is time to re-consider the approach.

      • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Their response was to avoid it, resulting in the worst option by default.

        It was clear this would be the result. Choosing not to vote was the worst option to choose both objectively, and morally. And considering the entire supposed reasoning was moral, they failed spectacularly.

        • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Choosing not to vote was the worst option to choose both objectively, and morally.

          Strictly speaking, assuming Democrats care about winning elections, it is not true.

          Sure, you get the worst option for one or two terms, but you would hopefully force the Democratic party to reform and stop supporting Genocides in the long term.

          This is why I hate when people try to shift the blame on voters. This was 100% the Democrats election to loose, and they did.

          You can’t really change the voters, so what is the point of complaining about them? You can change the party to allow it to win the next time. Blaming the voters is just distracting from that.

  • randon31415@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I think the guys at TLDR news said it best: if Trump threatening to withhold aid was enough to get a cease-fire deal, then Biden HAD enough leverage this whole time to get one. He just DIDN’T USE IT.

    If this poll is to be believed (which is a big if), Biden and Harris let a fascist back into the whitehouse because they didn’t want to stop a genocide.