• scarabic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 days ago

    Gee it seems like they could come up with a simple algorithm to protect low income people who are conserving.

    Aaaand why aren’t costs going down as usage goes down?

    • CosmicGiraffe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      Plenty of costs don’t depend on how much usage there is. If a tree falls and takes out a power line it cosrs the same whether that line was being used at 1% capacity or 100%

      • scarabic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        True, true. Other costs should track with usage though, like fuel. If they had said “when usage falls, costs don’t fall AS MUCH due to fixed costs” then I would totally get it. The way they phrased it makes it sound like costs going down just isn’t a thing that happens. Maybe that’s me.