• Frank Ring@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I see that you emphasize a lot on ownership.

    I do agree that some things should be managed publicly like healthcare, education, etc. Because those are necessities that everybody need.

    But other than that, I think most common trades should come from private property. That’s how businesses and wealth are built. I want this in exchange for that, and money often being involved.

    Also, ownership doesn’t always mean that you don’t work at all, it simply means that you use your resources and what you have adequately. Someone that has a lot of resources can probably manage to not work much, but still has to make important decisions on how to use these resources.

    We could obviously go into the small details, and I understand that private property can be abused when it goes too far. But that’s why I think we need a healthy balance of socialism and capitalism. Some things should be owned publicly, while other things are owned privately. It’s up to the society to create laws and regulations depending on their values.

    That being said, one of the reason I like FOSS is that it’s outside ownership system. It’s public, yet you retain all ownership rights.

    • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      But other than that, I think most common trades should come from private property. That’s how businesses and wealth are built. I want this in exchange for that, and money often being involved.

      Wealth for the business owners off the labor of the workers, ie exploitation.

      Also, ownership doesn’t always mean that you don’t work at all, it simply means that you use your resources and what you have adequately. Someone that has a lot of resources can probably manage to not work much, but still has to make important decisions on how to use these resources

      Management is labor, but labor no different than any other labor. It doesn’t entail many, many, many, many times the profits it entitles in Capitalism that comes directly from the Workers.

      We could obviously go into the small details, and I understand that private property can be abused when it goes too far. But that’s why I think we need a healthy balance of socialism and capitalism. Some things should be owned publicly, while other things are owned privately. It’s up to the society to create laws and regulations depending on their values.

      Private Property is abuse no matter how small, because it requires Workers be exploited. Additionally, it cannot last forever, and leads to increasing disparity and increasing exploitation. Society won’t magically legislate better laws, the laws are decided by those with power, ie wealthy Capitalists, and they would not allow their power to be stripped from them.

      Please read any leftist theory. The works I linked would be fantastic for you, but any kind of leftist knowledge would benefit you at this point.

      • Frank Ring@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I might look more into it.

        But whatever you’re explaining seems way too idealistic. To me at least.

        Everything obviously has power dynamics. The worker and the manager, for example.

        Capitalists have their own power. Coming from wealth and private ownership.

        And socialists also have their own. Coming from equality and collectivity.

        But I think expecting everything to be all nice, free, equal and collective is too good to be true. You have to be competent, useful and valuable to society.

        I have a friend and neighbor that is 68 and never worked in his entire life. Now, he’s quite intelligent but he decided to live on welfare his whole life because he could. I have absolutely zero respect for that. You talk so much about exploitation and abuse. Here’s an example of someone who abused and exploited a socialist system with his laziness and uselessness.

        Just like making everything private isn’t the right solution either.

        • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Capitalists have their own power. Coming from wealth and private ownership.

          And socialists also have their own. Coming from equality and collectivity.

          What power do Socialists have in a Capitalist system? This makes no sense.

          But I think expecting everything to be all nice, free, equal and collective is too good to be true. You have to be competent, useful and valuable to society.

          Who is saying that everything should be “nice, free, equal and collective?” What does that word salad even mean? Why do you think Socialists wouldn’t be useful to society, and why do you think parasitic Capitalists are useful?

          I have a friend and neighbor that is 68 and never worked in his entire life. Now, he’s quite intelligent but he decided to live on welfare his whole life because he could. I have absolutely zero respect for that. You talk so much about exploitation and abuse. Here’s an example of someone who abused and exploited a socialist system with his laziness and uselessness.

          Not only is Welfare not Socialism, but this person has stolen far less from the Workers than Capitalists do every single day.

          Please, read theory. It’s clear that you’re just vibing your takes and don’t actually understand the underlying mechanisms.

          • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Not only is Welfare not Socialism, but this person has stolen far less from the Workers than Capitalists do every single day.

            Why is this so hard to get for people?