• Anticorp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s not even the top 1% that are the problem, it’s the top 0.1% who are hoarding all the resources.

  • jpreston2005@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 months ago

    Don’t know if I picked this up somewhere, but I have a saying I oft repeat:

    A society will be judged by how it treats the least among them.

    Our society fucking hates poor people, and it kills me inside every time I’m reminded of it

    • GlendatheGayWitch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think Jesus even taught that whatever you do to the least of these, you do to me in reference to the poor. Yet the Christian fanatics are the ones doing their best to wreck the lower classes to benefit the richest.

  • rustydrd@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 months ago

    Don’t even have to invent anything new here: This is what purchasing power indices describe, and they definitely should play a much larger role in public discourse.

      • rustydrd@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’m a lay person, too, so I can’t help much with detailed references. My understanding is that PPP is intended for cross-country comparisons (i.e., purchasing power in one region/country compared with that in another). Purchasing power indices more generally measure the (real) value of someone’s wages (after deducting regular expenses like rent, insurance etc.) for purchasing certain goods (e.g., a standardized “basket of goods”).

        To find information for your country, you could check your national statistics agencies to see if they provide data on such indices. Real wages are one example that you can probably find, although they don’t adjust for cost of living expenses (but they typically do adjust for inflation).

  • shalafi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Robert Heinlein did an interesting thing. He and his wife Virginia wanted to tour the world, but didn’t want to do the usual trip, London, Paris, Rome, etc. They decided to tour the Southern hemisphere. Those essays are mind opening.

    Heinlein made a point of asking cab drivers to take them to the very poorest part of any given town in order to get a handle on the various economies. Think on that. (This was a guy who fucking loathed the Soviets, went to Moscow and calculated the true city population by observing shipping from his hotel window. His numbers turned out to be accurate. Virginia learned Russian, from listening to records, so as to not get faked out or fucked with on the trip. LOL, those two were extra.)

    One of my favorite bits finds them in Paraguay or Uruguay, I forget, and old Bob is angry with the cabbie. The were driven to a part of town with tiny little houses, flowers in the windows, neat gardens, clean roads, zero trash, all that.

    “I specifically asked you to take me to the poorest area!”

    “Oh senior, these are the poorest people. They are on assistance and are very ashamed.”

    This was all from Expanded Universe if you’re interested in reading more.

    Give this a shot as well:

    http://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015083085392%3Bq1%3D"robert+a+heinlein"%3Bstart%3D1%3Bsize%3D100%3Bpage%3Droot%3Bview%3Dimage%3Bseq%3D151%3Bnum%3D145

  • ryedaft@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    No, see, if prices go up in the stock market (and other investments like real estate) that’s good and means the economy is doing well and when prices go up for things like food and power that’s bad because people will need higher salaries or more money in welfare and that’s bad. And it’s bad because that decreases the gap between the richest and the poorest and that would decrease the amount of power the richest people have.