• dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    3 months ago

    Cases like this are frustrating. Spotify should NOT be able to stream any artist they want without paying them. But the judge said that’s OK because the victims waited too long to complain. The judge also said it’s totally OK that Spotify doesn’t have a list of what is legal for them to stream, simply because the list is constantly changing. This isn’t a paper list typed out by some secretary. This is a computer database that can be checked a thousand times a second.

    There’s also the fact that who was the actual copyright holder was questionable and changed hands during the whole thing, so nobody knew who they should be contracting with.

    • Ugurcan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I was there when Microsoft COFEE released on WhatCD. And it appears I’ll be there when the certain villains’s coke party released on RED.

      That being said, I left Spotify after 18 years recently because my money wasn’t going to artists I listen anyway. Bandcamp + SoulSeek + Lidarr is the way.

  • Breezy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Article states if there were any wrong found it would be up to the company they employ to collect payments instead of the actual company that owes them. Fuck home state of Tennessee.