That’s only true if you believe it’s the government’s duty to take care people.
That’s only true if you believe it’s the government’s duty to take care people.
Is your argument that having any view similar to a white supremists or Nazi that makes you a white supremists or Nazi?
The verse is not about using your neighbors wealth to help someone, it’s about using your own wealth to do so. The verse did not go.
I was a stranger and you did not invite me in to your neighbors house, I needed clothes and you did not clothe me with your neighbors clothing, I was sick and in prison and you did not have your neighbor look after me.’
“They also will answer, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or needing clothes or sick or in prison, and did not help you?’
“He will reply, ‘Truly I tell you, whatever you did not have your neighbor do for one of the least of these, you did not do for me.’
I’m not debating whether taking down the statue was right or not. My point of contention is that when Trump said very fine people there is no indication he was calling nazis and white supremists very fine people.
So some of the people there protesting the teardown were fine people?
They were there, he referred to people there as very fine people
Were there other people there besides white supremists and meo-nazis opposing the tear down of the statue?
No one is disputing Trump said “very fine people on both sides”, which is what your link confirms. The false narrative was that he was talking about neo-Nazis and white supremacists which he doesn’t mention at all. Your clip doesn’t prove Trump was talking about neo-Nazis and white supremacists, unless you can show that everyone who was there protesting the removal was a neo-Nazis or white supremacists.
I though the only distinction was for medical vehicles and military vehicles. There is a whole class of vehicles called Technical which is pretty much a pickup with a heavy machine gun mounted to it. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technical_(vehicle)