If they want to sign up to fight in Ukraine, they can go and fight in Ukraine. Calling for others to fight in Ukraine is a completely different thing.
If they want to sign up to fight in Ukraine, they can go and fight in Ukraine. Calling for others to fight in Ukraine is a completely different thing.
Only if you’re first in line
They wouldn’t make 4 episodes, they’d make 8 and half of them would be filler episodes.
AfD was not founded by former SS officers, wtf are you talking about?
The US warned repeatedly that Russia was going to invade.
Tragic: 99% of leftists who would totally do real radical praxis if they could, are too disabled to do anything at all 😪
You are drawing sweeping conclusions from very limited evidence. None of this shows a large part of the population voting for radical climate action, a few more people voting a little bit more centre left doesn’t mean much. It’s particularly telling that you’re trying to use the last EU election as evidence. Are you not aware that there was a right-ward shift in the European Parliament? The Greens in particular lost a lot. The EU continuing its course is far more indicative of technocratic governance over a democratic mandate.
You are deliberately obfuscating, to manufacture the appearance of support where there is too little. The issue is not that there is no climate action, the issue is that there is not enough of it. People, at least broadly, get the climate action that they vote for. Until climate swings elections in the way that the economy or migration does, the message to politicians will continue to be that people have other priorities.
No shit people are for fighting climate change in the abstract. But we’re not living in an abstract world, we are living in an actual one. One, where needs and desires compete. And consistently, other desires take priority over fighting climate change. There obviously isn’t as much support for actually combating climate change in the real world, with real consequences for real humans as you people assume.
If they have such high public support why doesn’t the public vote accordingly?
only 30% thought disruptive tactics were effective for issues with high awareness but low support
As if this is what was needed to prove it. Trump once answered a question about the failings of western liberalism by talking about how liberal cities on the west coast were doing badly.
The argument isn’t that they’re “evil”, it’s that they could be used as tools by strategic rivals.
Nvidia is already profitable and has been for over a decade.
Most people barely know about it nor do they care.
Okay this is crazy, Alexa play Inside Out by clipping.
You can sign up for the Ukraine foreign legion. Why haven’t you done so?