I handled the virtual paperwork for all leaves of absence at my last job, and there were multiple cases of medical leaves being extended indefinitely. There was something like several months to a year of extended absence before the company would even be allowed to consider firing, and other restrictions over handling medical LOA could make it almost impossible to get in contact with the employee to verify their recovery status.

Should a business be allowed to stop paying for medical coverage they promised to someone who in turn has a medical accident that puts them in a coma? Can the business legally or ethically assume they will never return or provide additional value to the company? Does your business give a shit about ethics?

You could view it as the employee gaming the system or taking advantage of a loophole, but the gray area definitely leaves more than just OP confused about what to do. In the longest case I remember, the reason they were able to stay employed for so long was nothing to do with how the employee was tolerated before leaving. From conversations, I got the impression that management would rather not have them return anyways

If you look at extra content surrounding the original, it becomes pretty clear that BGE2 is what they always wanted BGE to be in terms of scope and theme, but after so long in development now, I can’t help but wonder if the restrictions on scope were what made the original truly great.

I hope they manage to pull it together into a cohesive product eventually-- and I will be playing it when they do-- but I would be truly surprised if the sequel is as impactful or memorable as the OG