• 0 Posts
  • 4 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 18th, 2023

help-circle

  • Yes, but at the same time no imho.

    Authors of later books absolutely had access to the works of earlier authors. It wasn’t “the Bible” as we know it today, but there is a direct lineage where new material has been added and existing material has been edited, to result in the book we have now. That’s why the character of Jesus was able to fulfill prophecies.

    So I’d tend to define “the bible” as a collection of literary works and interpretations (I don’t think you can separate the two without losing significant meaning) that evolves over time. Evolutionary pressures can include how well a particular “species” serves the rulers at that time, and how well it fits with the general zeitgeist (eg apocalyptic or euphoric).

    So, like Trump, they didn’t have “the bible” but they had “a bible.”



  • PrinceWith999Enemies@lemmy.worldtowholesomememes@lemmy.worldDaryl Davis
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I respect Daryl Davis enormously and I think in many ways he shows us the best of who we can be.

    At the same time, the criticism I heard from (I believe) the person who was an NAACP executive was that Mr. Davis works against racism in retail mode, while organizations like the NAACP work in wholesale mode. It’s good to reach out a hand and change a mind, but these movements - the racists, misogynists, and LGBT-phobic - are recruiting thousands and tens of thousands. They can and should be humanized, but the real battles are being fought in the courts, the halls of government, and the media. I admire him and think he deserves to be elevated and we’d all be the better for it, but there’s a very real fight to be had in addition to reaching out a hand and doing a one at a time conversion.