There’s no way you can convince me that’s not Oscar Isaac.

Maybe because the whole fucking thing is a rat king of tangled conflicts of interest. If I were them I wouldn’t want anyone with half a spine to so much as look at me.

AKA: The Sun is 455,000 times brighter than 1/455,000th the brightness of The Sun.

And here we have in Jersey #43… OH GOD WHAT IS THAT!? SOME SORT OF DISGUSTING COSMIC HORROR! MY EYES!.. MY EYES!"

“Right you are John, and what rebound game he has. Really a stand out this season for them for sure.”

No, why would I give a shit? Let them die.

It’s not. They’ve definitely lost lawsuits before.

Not sure where you live but it’s typically illegal for your landlord to show up unannounced.

“I should call her.”

Even if this was just an “innocent” slip up it’s not like what he said wouldn’t have been racist otherwise. The dude is defending the false claims about Haitian immigrants. It’s still racist.

Yoko Ohyes

I just watched a video on Ulillillia like yesterday. I wonder what his Doom looks like.

Is the guy even all that smart? Like I realize he’s probably not like genuinely stupid. But every time I’ve seen him talk he doesn’t sound any more intelligent than a stoner cashier at Rite Aid.

This process is akin to how humans learn by reading widely and absorbing styles and techniques, rather than memorizing and reproducing exact passages.

Machine learning algorithms are not people and are not ingesting these works the same way a person does. This argument is brought up all the time and just doesn’t ring true. You’re defending the unethical use of copyrighted works by a giant corporation with a metaphor that doesn’t have any bearing on reality; in an age where artists are already shamefully undervalued. Creating art is a human process with the express intent of it being enjoyed by other humans. Having an algorithm do it is removing the most important part of art; the humanity.

So? That’s literally how game design works.

Why is she the one having to press charges in the first place? They assaulted a government employee on government property because she was doing her job. Kinda feels like something the US government should be prosecuting for. Like one of those “no, you fucked up. Direct to federal prison for you.” Kinda things.

Nintendo really only has a history of taking down fan remakes of existing Nintendo games or games that are charging money. They’ve never to my knowledge had a free fan game or romhack taken down nor do I think they’d have any sort of legal grounds to do so even if they wanted to. And this essentially boils down to a ROM hack. Which is almost certainly completely safe from Nintendo’s lawyers since it doesn’t contain any Nintendo made assets.

Does miyamoto do business stuff? Always thought he was the creative guy.

If I was the squatter: Fucking rad new pet! I’m now the coolest squatter in the world!

I mean. I provided an actual source for my statement with aggregated data supporting my point. You, however, have not.

Sounds like you need to be educated.

And also the frenulum is not the foreskin.

While I whole heartedly disagree with the practice of circumsizing babies. (babies can’t consent therfore an unnecessary procedure is just flat out unethical) It’s not really true to say science shows that the foreskin is erogenous or even that circumcision affects sexual pleasure.

There is a bit of conflicting data out there so there is still some debate over the fact but right now the data leans heavily toward there being little to no adverse affects on sexual pleasure. And in fact some anecdotal evidence actually seems to show that the opposite may be true; that circumsized penises may actually be more sensitive to sexual stimuli.

Again though, I can’t stress enough how much I believe circumsicion is wrong.

Source

Edit: hey guys. Coming back to this and uh, have learned some things. I’d like to retract this statement pretty please. Please forgive me.