If they’re so harmless, then why do you care if a very small portion of the electorate votes for them? After all it won’t make a dent, right? :)
I didn’t claim that anywhere.
To me it looks like you have a dysfunctional system.
The US does, so the looks are correct.
Because people are clearly unhappy with the democratic party, so there’s obviously a market for it.
There isn’t though. No third party has ever won the presidency.
In Congress, there has never been even 1% of them being third party. Same with the senate.
Where exactly is the market, and why is it not at all reflected in any part of the elected government?
Is it perhaps because it doesn’t exist?
Elsewhere, I went through and I’m pretty sure it is a mustang now.
This one looks kinda close, thinking it was a modified one
https://www.autoevolution.com/cars/ford-mustang-convertible-2004.html
I don’t think I’ll actually find a decent image of it without finding it again, as it seems it was modified.
There’s a difference between paying for usage and paying for access.
Although with all the fees added, most of what you pay isn’t even usage anymore…
A huge chunk of them are not where people want/need to live though.
Vacant housing in Detroit doesn’t help people living in SF