Yes, belief without evidence is peak narcissism in my eyes

it is the definition of delusion

Yes, they shouldn’t because they have no evidence and are therefore arrogantly asserting something they have no reason to believe

I never denied the possibility, I denied we should believe in those things

it sounds incredibly arrogant to me to assume you know something without evidence

No neither do astrophysicists, they think it might be true with healthy skepticism

or they have proven it true with observation, neither of which applies to religion

are you confident you’re not the arrogant one?

be·lief noun

1. an acceptance that a statement is true or that something exists.

“his belief in the value of hard work”

\2. trust, faith, or confidence in someone or something.

“I’ve still got belief in myself”

I don’t believe in anything without evidence and if I do I seek to correct that

belief without evidence is a failure of the mind

i don’t assume the vast majority of astrophysics is true

neither do astrophysicists

Evidence exists for astrophysics

I do not, why would I?

nobody asserts that, they assert that we don’t know, which is accurate it is religion that asserts it happened through magic

I do understand that it is something people made up without any evidence.

I am this arrogant about anything without evidence, if you present evidence, then I have a reason to believe.

All religion is untested made up nonsense, no exceptions.

If you make it up without evidence, it can be thrown out without evidence. Athiests make no claims, there’s nothing to throw out.

The real answer to these questions is “we have no idea”, everything else falls under russel’s teapot.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell's_teapot