No the comic is showing the government is litterally small, implying welfare cuts. Reality is, any “cuts” are just going to be moved somewhere else. Not given back to the tax payers.
No the comic is showing the government is litterally small, implying welfare cuts. Reality is, any “cuts” are just going to be moved somewhere else. Not given back to the tax payers.
Both love big gov, just slight differences in which wars they want to support and which industries will get government funding.
So accurate. Attention span issues.
I hate that argument though. “You shouldn’t enjoy things because you should pay more than the advertised, because that’s just how things are”. Change doesn’t happen unless change happens. Basically, if you want tipping culture to change, you actually have to start changing tipping culture.
What axiom is the left ideology built on that allows it to be ideologically pure? For example, the right has property rights to build on, which itself is derived from the ownership of your own person. What fundamental truth does the left build their views on?
Air pollution is about protecting an individuals property, not the air itself: lungs, orchards, fields, etc. Air is simply how the property damage was delivered. So, no one owns the air, but property damage dealt through the air should be pursued in court, like any other property damage.
And let’s not kid ourselves that the government has real incentive to reduce pollution. Overnight, someone like Trump gets put in charge and happily encourages the poisoning of the environment and individuals can’t sue in court, because the government said it was ok to pollute.
Pollution is a property rights issue, don’t need anything beyond private property rights and a court system to cover that. Price fixing is caused by government created barriers to entry, artificially restricting competition. In other words, price fixing is a problem caused by government overreach, so obviously government isn’t the solution.
I don’t disagree, I just hope people of different views can come together and see that decentralizing the power structure might be worth considering if you don’t like the amount of power we handed one man. That means cutting the federal government and moving those programs to local government, private charities, or the bin.
Maybe I’ll do a ‘let’s read’
Thanks, I’ll take a look, but I’ll reserve judgement until I’ve read it myself.
Open your eyes. Corporations already heavily influence policy. Stop making that possible by decentralizing the power!
Thanks! Almost 1000 pages… I’ll need some time…
Read the comments and note the downvotes, sir. I’m definitely in the minority here. Therefore I would dare suggest it is in fact you who are the thoughtless parrot here. Governments are corrupt and incompetant organizations, and the bigger they become, the more corrupt and incompetant they are. If you truly are concerned that a single man can wreck such damage, you need to understand that is only possible because people like you have built up an organization that holds far too much power. The obvious solution is to shrink the scope of that organization so that a single maniac can’t do so much damage.
Big government is to blame for Trump having so much power. Learn, or be doomed to see history repeat itself.
Where can we read the actual agenda?
deleted by creator
Never heard of that for, it looks exactly built for this problem, better than torrent. Good call.
anyway to use torrent protocol somehow? Like popcorn time did?
My work has a process for requesting software. Over the last five years, I’ve been slowly getting open source alterntives approved, using them, and telling coworkers they’re approved. It’s just one super specialized software left.