I’ve subscribed to their RSS feed, but their server is so unreliable, my feed reader complains all the time that it is unreachable. When I manually retry it mostly works, only to fail again later. I’m wondering what’s going on there. I never have this problem with any other feed…
- 2 Posts
- 16 Comments
486@lemmy.worldto
Selfhosted@lemmy.world•FTTH upgrade - getting my LAN multi gig readyEnglish
2·10 months agoAnyone have experience converting from 1G LAN to 2.5 or even 10?
Going from 1 G to 2.5 G is fairly cheap these days. You can almost certainly use the same cabling, even when you’ve got only Cat.5e cabling. While you can do 10 G over copper, I wouldn’t suggest doing that, since it consumes quite a lot of power compared to both 1 G and 2.5 G. You’d need Cat.6E for reliable 10 G over copper.
I like Miniflux.
486@lemmy.worldto
Selfhosted@lemmy.world•Homelab upgrade - "Modern" alternatives to NFS, SSHFS?English
5·1 year agoNFS is bulletproof.
For it to be bulletproof, it would help if it came with security built in. Kerberos is a complex mess.
486@lemmy.worldto
Selfhosted@lemmy.world•How do you handle SSL certs and internet access in your setup?English
9·1 year agoor a domain with a random string of characters so no one could reasonably guess it? Does it matter?
That does not work. As soon as you get SSL certificates, expect the domain name to be public knowledge, especially with Let’s Encrypt and all other certificate authorities with transparency logs. As a general rule, don’t rely on something to be hidden from others as a security measure.
When hosting this locally, I don’t see how 200 GB is much of an issue. Storage is so cheap these days, if you want to host it locally, just buy a 256 GB SSD just for that data for $20. Anyway, you were asking for a mirror, to which I replied with the information about the ZIM files. I don’t really understand the issue. Stackoverflow just isn’t that small, there is not much you can do about that.
I think it’d take a few hours to setup even a smaller copy of SO, which isn’t ideal for answering a quick question.
The download? Maybe, depends on your Internet connection’s speed. Actually serving it as a website certainly doesn’t take hours. It is rather a matter of seconds.
Of course they aren’t small, but they are probably as small as it gets, since they are pretty efficiently compressed. I am not sure what you mean by
it’s not a straightforward operation for even the average developer or systems engineer to restore these into a working format
since it is really trivial to use them. Just load them with Kiwix and serve them as a website. It doesn’t get much easier than that.
You can download pretty much all of stackoverflow as ZIM files for self-hosting.
486@lemmy.worldto
Technology@lemmy.world•No Frills PCB Brings USB-C Power To The BreadboardEnglish
21·1 year agoMissed opportunity there, not being able to select all the other available USB-PD voltages. Not every circuit runs on 3.3 or 5 V.
486@lemmy.worldto
Selfhosted@lemmy.world•Security blindspots for selfhosted websiteEnglish
11·1 year agoUnless you require the dynamic features of Wordpress, you could have a look at some of the static site generators out there (such as Hugo). Having a static site would reduce the attack surface considerably. Also due to the shenanigans happening with Wordpress at the moment, I would be weary of using it.
About SSL, what others have already mentioned, SSL certs are available for free these days, thanks to letsencrypt.
486@lemmy.worldOPto
Selfhosted@lemmy.world•Concerns Raised Over Bitwarden Moving Further Away From Open-SourceEnglish
3·1 year agoThanks, I haven’t seen that one before, but I’d really prefer an open source application.
486@lemmy.worldOPto
Selfhosted@lemmy.world•Concerns Raised Over Bitwarden Moving Further Away From Open-SourceEnglish
9·1 year agoBitWarden already has lots of clients.
Does it? I’d be very much interested to know. I’ve been looking for other clients before, because I didn’t like the sluggishness of the Electron client, but couldn’t find any usable clients at all. There are some projects on Github, none of which seemed to be in a usable state. Perhaps I have been missing something.
This is being blown a bit out of proportion though. All they are saying is the official SDK may have some non-free components going forward. So what? It’s a private company, they can do what they want. Or the community can just fork it and move forward with a free one if they want, but it’s just not going to be in the official BitWarden clients. Hardly news or a big deal.
Nobody said that they can’t do that (although people rightfully questioned that their changes are indeed comatible with the GPLv3). I very much disagree that this isn’t a big deal, though.
Try diasbling the second DHCP server altogether. You only need one, since you have a flat network.
Are you sure there is exactly one DHCP server running?
The guide mentions:
Your ISP will give you the first 64 bits, and your host machine will have the last 64 bits.
This isn’t correct. While some ISPs do give you the first 64 bit (a /64 prefix), this isn’t recommended and not terribly common either. An ISP should give its users prefixes with less than 64 bit. Typically a residential user will get a /56 and commercial users usually get a /48. With such a prefix the user can then generate multiple /64 networks which can be used on the local network as desired.

The easiest way to do it is by running a Kiwix server and hosting a copy of Wikipedia with that.