• Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      12 days ago

      Really, I think anyone considering themselves a Leftist needs to read False Witnesses and Masses, Elites, and Rebels: The Theory of “Brainwashing.” Both are excellent examples of why people don’t change their minds when seeing indisputable evidence, they willingly go along with narratives that they find more comfortable. It explains the outright anger liberals express when anticommunism is debunked. That doesn’t mean Communists don’t do the same thing, but as we live in a liberal dominated west (most likely, assuming demographics) this happens to a much lesser extent because liberalism is that which supplies these “licenses” to go along, while Communism requires hard work to begin to accept. This explains the mountains of sources Communists keep on hand, and the lack thereof from liberals who argue from happenstance and vibes.

    • HenriVolney@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      12 days ago

      One could argue that the Church had been extremely efficient at manufacturing consent for centuries. It was still the case for most of French society in the late 1780s. It also led to a civil war between Revolutionaries and traditionalists (including peasants).

    • Lemming6969@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      12 days ago

      Poverty in 1700 is very different from poverty in 2000, which allows for significant, but not unlimited, skewing.