• Grapho@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Again, unfalsifiable nonsense, both A and the opposite of A are proof that China bad, no need for evidence.

    What’s more, why do they have to be critical? What are they missing from their lives? Their government actually works lmao. More than 700 million pulled out of poverty, corrupt officials at all levels get jailed or executed, most young people own their house, everyone has a job and very cheap food and cultural activities, as well as the best public transit in the world and well maintained infrastructure, not to mention billionaires keep their fucking mouths shut unless it is to pay lip service to the people’s government.

    You know who punishes their citizens, verifiably often and viciously? Say it with me: the USA. The Ferguson protesters were murdered one by one in the following months with no investigation, the occupy wall street organizers were detained by Homeland security, the black panther party was infiltrated and their leaders murdered by police whether openly or covertly, the Gaza protests had students beaten, arrested and tried en masse and the US passes new surveillance and protest crackdown laws every other day it seems.

    And, on the opposite side, what good does “being allowed to be critical” do, in and of itself? About 30% of Americans approve of the government at any given time, corrupt officials are openly insider trading, passing laws for bribes that they don’t even have to hide, and big business is allowed to KILL YOU FOR PROFIT.

    You liberals are delusional, you buy that you live in the best country ever and shit is almost impossible to change for the better and assume the rest of us must have it so much worse, facts be damned.

    • r_se_random@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      I base my opinion on multiple people I personally know who moved from China to SG, because they were unhappy with the kind of control government maintained over any public criticism. I won’t pretend that I remember all the instances they’ve mentioned, but I know better than to reject the claims of the countries citizen when they have some concerns. I won’t pretend that I know better than the people living in the damned country.

      • Grapho@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        We all know Chinese people, dude, there’s 1.4 billion of them lmao. That doesn’t make you an authority on their opinion and the sample size is negligible to say the least. 95 percent of them, according to Harvard, are happy with the government.

        • r_se_random@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          I never claimed to be an authority, and there’s a reason I mentioned it was my opinion.

          And again, it’s not like there could be selection biases in a Harvard study. That absolutely never happens.

          • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            And again, it’s not like there could be selection biases in a Harvard study. That absolutely never happens.

            Jesus dude, just admit that nothing could ever be enough to change your mind.

          • Grapho@lemmy.mlOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            The only biases that Harvard could pull would be AGAINST the interests of the CPC, that’s the point. You wouldn’t accept a Chinese poll because of racism/chauvinism so I provide overwhelming proof even on your terms and the answer is “em, uh, nu uh”.