I didn’t say that I perceive the whole of NYT as bad. In fact I didn’t say anything about how I perceive the NYT at all.
I was merely trying to explain that such a subjective assessment may be very different from subject to subject doing the assessment.
You can very well find good things in NYT based on your own emotional feelings.
Some things they do well. Some things not so well. Doesn’t have to be one or the other.
That depends on who looks at it, too.
It can very well be seen as all bad, why wouldn’t it?
Because that’s idiotic. The crossword puzzle is “bad” too? You can’t learn anything from a single one of their articles?
Writing off the entire thing as “all bad” is based on your emotional feelings about the NYT, not any rational or factual reasoning.
I didn’t say that I perceive the whole of NYT as bad. In fact I didn’t say anything about how I perceive the NYT at all.
I was merely trying to explain that such a subjective assessment may be very different from subject to subject doing the assessment.
You can very well find good things in NYT based on your own emotional feelings.
Okay I get that, everyone has different taste.
They don’t like the font, too?
The weather reports are bad?
If someone can’t find a few nice things to say about anything they’re a cunt, you may not know this yet but it is true.