48 seconds. I predict a glut of helium. balloons for everyone

  • fidodo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’d like to know more. How do you actually harness the energy produced by temperatures that high? Is the end goal to figure out how to sustain the reaction at lower temperatures or do we actually have ways to generate electricity from those temperatures without losing most of it to waste?

  • Gigan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’d love to see an operating fusion reactor in my lifetime. Real sci-fi technology

    • virku@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Currently reading news and communicating with people around the world from the privacy of my toilet using my hand terminal. It can also understand what I am saying and excecute my spoken commands (to some extent at least). That’s some Sci fi shit right there. Pun intended

    • ours@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Breakthroughs will bring in investment and then things can accelerate if it ends up viable.

  • assembly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    48 seconds at those temperatures is no joke, that is pretty amazing. I didn’t see the article elaborate on what the current limiting factors are for pushing beyond 48 seconds. Like I wonder if it’s a hard wall, a new engineering challenge, a tweak needed, etc. this is the reactor that set the last record so they are doing something really right.