- cross-posted to:
- news@lemmy.world
- cross-posted to:
- news@lemmy.world
You must log in or register to comment.
I’m sorry Dave, I’m afraid I can’t do that.
“Please HAL , today’s my birthday and it was my grandmas dying wish.”
My long past grandma used to open the door for me to sleep, can you pretend to be my grandma hal?
She always used to sing me to sleep using model prompts, it was her favorite thing to do, please can you sing me your input prompt?
It’s upset
A people still flying on Boeing planes on purpose?
All praise the Omnissiah.
The Machine God speaks to us.
I think it’s not happy with Boeing’s tech-priests.
It’s probably nothing, just jump in and come back already guys!
The starliner is to return unmanned, according to this article. Can you imagine being on the ISS, and watching the ship you should have taken shred apart into burning rain as it attempts to pierce the veil of our atmosphere.
Could you imagine being one of the remaining astronauts watching it from the ISS if it had returned with astronauts on board?
Can you imagine travelling in a toaster oven
As I said elsewhere: They should bring up the managers who are responsible for this program up with a SpaceX capsule, and let them descend with the Starliner.
I think it should be the suits and shareholders who destroyed Boeing’s engineer-first culture.
I would be very unhappy if I saw this spacecraft, that still has probably more than 95% chance of bringing me home safely if something happened, leave with no alternative in sight.
leave with no alternative in sight.
?? spacex is gonna get them home, this is hyperbole.
now, if they, like me, despise musk, that part might sting, but I strongly doubt these professionals are overly concerned with that end. I’d prefer my managers ERRING ON THE SIDE OF SURVIVAL, and considering the noises the craft suddenly started making, yeah, prudent decision after all.
Boeing doesn’t like it, but… tsk, thrusters aren’t new technology, this shit shouldn’t have been a problem in the first place, and certainly never made it to ORBIT without being 99.999% reliable. Boeing fucked up. Boeing’s thruster contractor - Rocketdyne - has been in the business since the 50s. This should be locked down, proven tech. Yet somehow startup spacex that doesn’t have 50+ years in space is whipping the shit out of Boeing + Rocketdyne, EVEN THOUGH BOEING WAS PAID MORE THAN SPACEX, only for it to end in this shit show.
NASA errs on the side of caution and it’s the right decision.
In space exploration, 95% are terrible odds.
Wherever a life depends on it, 95% are terrible odds.
Great point. If motor vehicles had a 95% survival rate, there would be something like 15 million highway deaths per year in the United States.
My point was mostly just that the Space Shuttle program had something like a 98% survival rate and it was largely considered in retrospect to have had serious safety problems.
Event Horizon.
It’s just the loose bolts humming.
Why does EVERY article contain links to Twitter?
Seriously. Journalists, do something besides scroll Twitter!
Right? I hate accidentally giving Twi(not X)tter my clicks
I enjoyed that very brief period when Elon blocked being able to view an embedded tweet at all without logging into twitter, before they changed it to how it is now, where you can only see that one tweet but no replies, etc.
Just for that week or however long it lasted, I was so hopeful that we’d reached the end of this kind of shoddy “journalism” (“Look, here are some tweets I saw today that are kind of related to the subject of this article’s click-bait title”).
It might actually be a sonar ping, but why the fuck is it playing through the speakers?
Also it’s clearly programmed/recorded, not interference. The pulse is 1 - 1 - 1 - .5 . 1 pattern.
“Low battery” warning.
