BadmanDan@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 2 days agoKamala Harris won politicaly engaged voters, but lost voters who don't follow politics.www.nbcnews.comexternal-linkmessage-square81fedilinkarrow-up1254arrow-down113
arrow-up1241arrow-down1external-linkKamala Harris won politicaly engaged voters, but lost voters who don't follow politics.www.nbcnews.comBadmanDan@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 2 days agomessage-square81fedilink
minus-squareEmpireInDecay@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down4·1 day agoWhy is the default argument from liberals always ‘but Trump?’ Harris would have been a shit candidate not worthy of being elected regardless of who her opponent was.
minus-squarebtaf45@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·11 hours agoHarris was going to raise taxes on billionaires and corporations. Why the fuck would you NOT vote for that?
minus-squareFreefall@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·1 day agoBecause she wouldn’t have been shit. Your argument is invalid.
Why is the default argument from liberals always ‘but Trump?’ Harris would have been a shit candidate not worthy of being elected regardless of who her opponent was.
Harris was going to raise taxes on billionaires and corporations. Why the fuck would you NOT vote for that?
Because she wouldn’t have been shit. Your argument is invalid.