• pressanykeynow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    6 days ago

    If the numbers are true it costed him less than 0.1% of his wealth which is surprising how little it takes. Would you spend 0.1% of your wealth to elect a President and gain a government post that will bring you more wealth? Would you spend 1% of your wealth to become insanely rich? 10%?

    In the society where power is measured by wealth ultra rich should not exist. Or better such society should not exist.

    Also Musk wasn’t even the biggest donor. And Harris was okay with this whole thing, she also received enormous donations. Who was against ultra rich? Bernie Sanders. No wonder he was sacked despite popular support.

    • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      No I wouldnt spend 1 percent of my wealth to become insanely rich. Mostly cause that implies corruption and I aint nearly as bad as my kin though I have far more homicidal tendencies.

  • Seeders@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Now look how much money Kamala received to “buy” the election.

    The Biden—now Harris—campaign committee raised $997.2 million and Trump’s campaign committee raised $388 million in total between Jan. 2023 and Oct. 16, 2024

    woops

  • running_ragged@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    He also spent 44 billion buying twitter to disrupt and control the conversations happening there as part of his efforts, and now the the government essentially has a data mining tool and propaganda machine without actually ‘owning’ it.

  • Seeders@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    I wish I had a schilling

    for every senseless killing

    I’d buy a government

    America’s for sale

    And you can get a good deal on it

    And make a healthy profit

    Or maybe tear it apart

    Start with assumption

    That a million people are smart

    Smarter than one

  • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 days ago

    yes for him the USA is just a high return investment and livelihoods of the US citizens are just expandibles.

  • pjwestin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    I mean, yeah, but they’d be in a better position to make that argument if they hadn’t been campaigning with Mark Cuban. (Not that Robert Reich needs to be told that, but it still needs to be said.)