It’s easy to mock Nigel Farage: a cartoonish nationalist who’s made more comebacks than any pop star, who’s failed to win a seat in Westminster on seven different occasions, and whose urgent mission to save Britain from disaster doesn’t stop him selling bottles of “Farage gin” on the side (£40). Farage is aware of this mockery, too – and you sense a desire for revenge is partly what motivates him. As he infamously told the European parliament after the 2016 referendum, “When I came here 17 years ago … you all laughed at me – well, I have to say, you’re not laughing now, are you?”
…
Even influential Conservatives – who desperately consume whatever Farage is selling, praying his followers will be included in the deal – heap insults on him. Michael Gove recently likened Farage to a clown or showman – a source of “amusement and diversion” – and called Reform UK “a giant ego trip”. David Cameron says that Farage is “trying to destroy the Conservative party” and offers only “inflammatory language and hopeless policy”, having previously called his supporters “fruitcakes and loonies and closet racists”. Farage’s friendly comments about Putin on Friday – that Nato and the EU “provoked” Russia’s invasion of Ukraine – has provided fresh opportunities for them to take the moral high ground. But Conservatives never square this condescension with their capitulation to his demands. Why, despite being in power for 14 years with ever bigger majorities, have they let Farage make such a strong claim to being the most influential politician of the period? Looking back on the soap opera of British politics since 2010, it is Conservative prime ministers who make cameo appearances, and Farage who is the arch protagonist, shaping events, sealing fates, hogging the media’s attention.
Now, as this series of Tory rule draws to a close, Farage is claiming that he wants to kill off the same Conservative party that has granted his every wish. There’s a strong sense of deja vu: in Reform, Farage is leading his third different party in four elections; immigration is again being framed as a national emergency, after a brief pause; and the “smug, complacent and snobby” Cameron, as he put it in a recent Daily Telegraph column, is again the target of Farage’s ire.
But there is one major novelty. Farage’s party has overtaken or drawn level with the Tories in many polls. In the past, Conservatives liked to say that a vote for Farage was a vote for Labour. Farage now says, gleefully, that a vote for the Conservatives is a vote for Labour. “A Tory vote is a now wasted vote – we are now the real opposition,” he declares. Who’s laughing now?
As ever, Conservatives are split over what to do with the former City broker. While figures such as Suella Braverman and Jacob Rees-Mogg are eager to incorporate Farage and his crowd into the Tories’ electoral coalition, others – from Cameron to Kemi Badenoch – are steadfastly opposed. The Conservatives know this conundrum well. In their quest to defeat Labour, a question recurs throughout the party’s history: how to maintain an aura of respectability, and thus keep its moderates on side, without losing voters to parties further on the right?
…
The Conservatives justify these contortions by arguing that if they weren’t there to acknowledge these views, they would carry Britain to even darker places. But for the past decade, far from being a check on the far right’s power, the Conservatives have opened the door for it, allowing fringe reactionary interests to swamp Britain’s culture and politics. Leaving the European Union, tying all overseas aid to foreign policy interests, trying to send asylum seekers to Rwanda, prioritising funding for the armed forces – all these policies would be at home in a Thatcher-era National Front manifesto, and they are all now promoted by the Conservative party. The Tories might bicker over whether Farage has a place in their party, but in truth they made their peace with Faragism long ago: lax on inequality and authoritarian on immigration, with a few kind words about the NHS thrown in, sums up the Tory strategy for most of the past 50 years.
Could Farage become leader of the Conservatives? One tempting answer is that he already has. But as this bruising phase of Tory government has taught us, things can always get worse. A Conservative party featuring Farage anywhere near its leadership would be a more reactionary mainstream force than Britain has ever seen in modern history. Is this what Farage is working towards? Does he want to destroy the Conservative party and rebuild it in his image, or simply flog a few more bottles of gin? Unless Farage thinks the Conservatives will get even fewer than Reform’s half-dozen or so expected seats, his claim to being the opposition is bluster. But Farage didn’t get where he is by understating his influence and, more worryingly, the Tories have an unhappy habit of making his outlandish fantasies come true.
This is my worry - his sudden U-turn suggests someone has had serious words with him about how this is the best time to strike as the stars have aligned to show a route for him to get into power. He doesn’t need to win (m)any seats, he just needs to wreck the Tories chances in a number of seats, dragging them to historic lows and then propose some kind of merger as the best way to remove the threat. With so few MPs left and a desperation in the party, he can pitch himself as the best candidate to beat Starmer and, he may well be.
It would make the Tory party into the National Front Lite but they’re already most of the way there:
It Can’t Happen Here?