• exanime@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Actually, the other way around. We keep on compartmentalizing, Trump can lie all he wants and nothing happens, but Joe stutters and it’s a national disgrace… How can you compare one without including the only alternative?

    • nekandro@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Republicans accept a post-truth society where everything is someone’s propaganda, that the federal government is out to get them and that the union would be better served as a union of state-level republics. Democrats still believe in the existence of a ground truth and want a union with centralized control (i.e., they are Federalists). Like the Federalists, the Democrats are backed by wealthy financial states (New York, California) as opposed to more rural/working-class states (Alabama, Ohio) and support heavy industrial subsidies (Biden’s IRA, CHIPS) as well as weak state governments.

      This is a fundamental difference that explains a lot, actually. The role of government has always been to convince populations to pursue the policy goals of the elite. The foundations of representative democracy involve choosing which elites’ policy goals to follow. The Republicans want to follow state elites (to borrow a Chinese proverb, the mountains are high and the President is far away). The Democrats want to follow federal elites.

      Here’s the real problem. The US gets to choose between a career politician and a career businessman (swindler, by definition). Who represents the working class? Who represents the people who actually built America’s economy?

      • exanime@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Nobody represents the people, but that’s not a new problem nor, in anyway, a new thing in this Trump era

        My biggest fear is that the USA always gets to chose someone who does not represent them at all but at least had the notion that we need a planet to live in

        Trump is a man child and will see the world burn out of petty spite. And us, in the rest of the world, would have to still live with those consequences

        So back to the debate and the choice between Biden and Trump… Sure Biden is a terrible option, like chosing to get cancer… But Trump is like chosing to be gang raped, shot and left for dead in an open sewer and here we are pretending the 2 bad options are somehow the same

        • The Cuuuuube@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Every American election for /years/ was coke v Pepsi. Not sure when it became coke v battery acid, nor why so many people are like “well I don’t like cola so maybe it will be okay to drink battery acid” and why it is that the Democrats still want to run coke when America has made it abundantly clear we’d like to be offered the chance to drink SOME CLEAN FUCKING WATER JESUS FUCKING CHRIST

        • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          My biggest fear is that the USA always gets to chose someone who does not represent them at all but at least had the notion that we need a planet to live in

          That’s the part you’re missing. People are legitimately asking themselves “If these two people are my only choices and won’t improve my quality of life do I want to keep living?”